this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
66 points (91.2% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3110 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Subtracty@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Generative Ai is such a drain on our resources. While I am happy this is bringing about more green energy sources, watching it be poured into such meaningless bullshit is depressing.

[–] M600@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, AI models will improve and so will the hardware. Hopefully that means down the line, Ai will run on pretty conventional hardware and there will be an abundance of green energy.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

Awfully optimistic of you.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be honest, I'm surprised Google/Alphabet hasn't tried to get into running their own reactor by this point. Energy seems like the one thing they haven't touched yet.

[–] interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Probably because once you start a nuclear reactor you can't kill the project and discard it on a whim.

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

That was a nasty line by you

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Eh, that's their software side. Google doesn't do that with hardware infrastructure like data centers.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didn't they try to make their own ISP and then left it behind?

[–] pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They didn't kill it where it was already running though.

Source: this comment posted through Google Fiber

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They Just stopped expanding then?

[–] Macallan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

No, they are still expanding. It's just happening really slowly. They are actively laying fiber and expanding in several cities in AZ right now.

A quick search will bring up cities they are planning on moving into.

[–] pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

That's my understanding

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, it was more expensive than anticipated to lay new fiber and then they had to fight entrenched monopolies in control of regulators at every turn.

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Microsoft:

Google: Hey! That is a great idea! Let me say publicly that I want to do the same