Technology

Exactly, permissive licenses such as MIT allow for other people to do a rugpull and change the deal (pray I don’t alter it any further). With open source licenses the community can just fork.

That’s why I always pick AGPL for my projects. Then I can be certain that the code can be freed from greedy hands, and the actual users get all the value of the effort I put in.

VC funding really is making a deal with the devil, because you suddenly have a huge amount of cash, so the startup starts living large (hire more devs, run on expensive cloud infrastructure). But sooner or later they want their money back, plus interest; and few services are profitable, let alone that profitable. So the only thing that startups are usually capable of is to squeeze their users for all they’re worth.

Take a look at all the big startups and see:

• how long it took for them to be profitable
• how much VC funding they got until then

Companies need to pay that back and then some.

And don’t forget that VC’s see this as a perpetual investment, so your revenue must grow year after year, even if you’ve saturated the market.

Remember that Patreon is a for-profit service.

44% of the web, but blog monkeys always conflate the www with "the internet"

I have multiple --wp-… overrides in my global usercss. It does wonders.

Nothing is stopping anyone from doing that, other than perhaps the scale.

WordPress is like 40-something% of all websites: it's the most used blog/cms/whatever platform by a huuuuge margin.

If you wanted to fork it, you'd need pretty substantial resources, a lot of committed people, and the willingness to head a giant-ass project that has millions of users, all who want different things.

It really isn't a trivial undertaking, if you're serious about it.

I would, however, expect that the big providers (Flywheel, Cloudways, WPEngine, etc.) will probably make a corpo-sponsored fork sooner rather than later, since their business depends on it, and they've got the aforementioned money and people to do it.