this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
122 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3394 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I am surpised anyone would work with altman, dude radiates grifter among the grifter.

I wouldnt be surpised if he goes down similar to theranos and ftx scammers.

Keep a close eye on worldcoin.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didn’t his staff riot to have him returned? Somehow this is more meaningful to me than the fact that the internet hates yet another rich tech guy, which is an almost guaranteed thing.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No idea... Is that what the news said?

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yes 743 out of 770 employees signed a letter demanding the reinstatement of Altman and resignation of the board after they tried to oust him.

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-67470876

I mean this is a bald fact. The people who worked for him went to bat to keep working for him.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If Microsoft is expected to keep shoveling money into a bottomless pit, the bottomless pit is expected to keep producing temporary gains to the donor’s stock price.

Turns out the only people willing to pay for AI are other tech investors.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's ouroboros all the way down.

[–] vonxylofon@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

*ouroBROs 🤑

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's not a 'bromance' if they're not dudes. They are companies.

[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Blame Altman on that one, from the article:

Altman once called OpenAI’s partnership with Microsoft “the best bromance in tech,”

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't care what Altman said. These are megacorporations using buzzwords. No need to mutilate ourselves into idiotic commercials for them.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Corporations are people, my friend

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No they're not, guy. I aggressively dismiss any legal vomit that claims they are.

[–] vonxylofon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Altman is definitely a tech bro. Nadella is, I'd say, also one, although I'm getting a bit of "How do you do, fellow kids" vibe from him.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

nvidia executive called saltman a podcasting bro

[–] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Take a cup a coffee, a comfortable seat, and enjoy the posts from Ed Zitron about OpenAI and the AI fever in general outlining clearly how that hype is a financial disaster waiting to happen. It's a good read: www.wheresyoured.at

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

That's one of the articles, Ed has two or three more about the whole AI scam that's interesting to read.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And OpenAI is getting desperate. According to Fortune, OpenAI’s culture is deeply brittle, with a “relentless pressure to introduce products” rushing its o1 model to market as Sam Altman was “eager to prove to potential investors in the company’s latest funding round that OpenAI remains at the forefront of AI development” despite staff saying it wasn’t ready. 

These aren’t the actions of a company that’s on the forefront of anything — they’re desperate moves made by desperate people burning the candle at both ends.

Yet, once you get past these problems, you run head-first into the largest one: that generative AI is deeply unprofitable to run. When every subscriber or API call loses you money, growth only exists to help flog your company to investors, and at some point investors will begin to question whether this company can stand on its own two feet. 

It can’t. 

OpenAI is a disaster in the making, and behind it sits a potentially bigger, nastier disaster — a lack of any real strength in the generative AI market. If OpenAI can only make a billion dollars as the leader in this market (with $200 million of that coming from Microsoft reselling its models), it heavily suggests that there is neither developer nor user interest in generative AI products.

Whew. It’s brutal.

Heh. Good. It should be brutal.

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Thanks! Added it to my RSS. 😎

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Unrelated, I can't help noticing how much Altman reminds me of Luke Dunphy from Modern Family.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

You take that back!