this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
-14 points (28.1% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3223 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

a fisheye lens-style view of a plane making an air trail.

The trail emerging from the tail of the plane, as if it was a rocket.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Art is subjective, but this isn't really art, it's just AI slop. It’s incredible to me that this is what OpenAI thinks we should be excited about.

It was neat at first but now, two years later, as Schmidt is arguing we should abandon environmental goals to power AI, and billions in venture capital has been thrown away on this instead of actual, useful, functional technologies, it’s clear this isn’t going anywhere anytime soon.

This is their flagship video, already couched in “dreamy” and “fantastical” descriptors and it’s terrible. Generative AI is garbage. Actual data science and ML isn’t sexy and the profit margins are less.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

One of the planes in that video was straight up missing a wing.

That was utterly dire, and this is supposed to be a showcase of the technology?

[–] eggymachus@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

what a shining example of unbiased and impartial reporting 🙄

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Right, didn't even bother to do the bare minimum of finding out if that's intentionally how they wanted the video or not, then even acknowledges that fact at the end of the article.