this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
27 points (93.5% liked)

Games

16785 readers
826 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Didn't they give away the sims 4 for free starting in 2023?

It's no surprise that anyone who even had a remote interest in the sims might pick it up if you're giving it away. How many of those users went on to buy their stupidly overpriced DLC? That's what they really care about.

[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's so dumb because it would be so easy for them to use a business model people don't hate since it's a genuinely good game but they just won't. If they charged like $20 for the base game and maybe like $5 each for the DLCs I would probably buy the game and a few DLCs, but all the DLCs are so expensive that my options are either play the base game for free or pirate all the DLC for free, so either way EA gets no money out of someone who would otherwise have been a paying customer

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Sports games are and have always been incredibly tame and boring.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Upvote for a decent example. I didn't know a modern version of this existed. The super old one is one of the few examples of a daring sports game I could think of.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah it is a blast splitscreen and I could care less about (american) football honestly, it is just good arcade fun.

[–] shani66@ani.social 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I seem to remember some games from before the 2000s being really wild. Like, i remember playing this one street basketball game where you could just attack the other team.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 5 points 3 weeks ago

You're right, back in the 80s and 90s some devs actually had the balls to make interesting sports games.

20+ years of enshittification has caused me to overlook them.