this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
542 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3050 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 47 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 39 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Disney’s clown management refused to air a trans focused episode because of the “political climate” saying that “LGBTQ+ experience are a sensitive issue” thus catering to bigots.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

To be fair, knowing Disney's track record it probably would have been as embarrassing as the short-lived super hero duo of Snowflake and Safespace...

or the Transgender Unicorn Powerpuff Girls episode

or the "Quagmire's Dad" episode of Family Guy

or the Women's Prison episode of "Lost Girl"

...Look I don't trust big name mainstream companies to touch trans voices with a 69 foot pole in a way that makes me give any reaction other than "Can you just call me a slur and be done with it? That would be less offensive at this point!"

(Though Indie platforms are a lot better at this given things like Celeste being an entire game comparing the trans experience of coming out and transitioning to climbing a mountain and Helluva Boss' actually having Millie's Sister be a likable character who is openly trans but not on a soapbox nor a punching line. Implying her existence is valid and not worth mocking OR apologizing for.)

To be even farier, choosing neutrality in times of oppression means you side with the oppressor.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Oh I suppose they don’t need our money

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 35 points 4 days ago
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 101 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Kinda lends itself to the theory that they are part of the Problem

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I have no love for big corps, but they're likely just reading the writing on the wall. they have to deal with retribution for the next 4-12 years and they have no interest becoming the rebels. I'm kinda impressed they stepped away at all other than it probably was money spent for nothing.

[–] fern@lemmy.autism.place 31 points 4 days ago (2 children)

IBM supported the Nazis, and if they're the only tech giant not fighting musk they're going to get the kickbacks. Corps dont do "writing on the wall" anymore, they chase money, which may look similar but the goals are different.

[–] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The writing on the wall is if you want government money don't piss off the pool boy of cheetolini

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 60 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's extraordinarily on brand of them

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I was going to say that's incredibly on brand for Disney. Everything I have ever heard about Comcast seems to back up this move.

I'm surprised about IBM though, more because I didn't realize they were still around than anything else.

[–] Zacpod@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (6 children)

IBM sold "inmate" counting machines to Nazi Germany. Like, sent techs there to the camps to size up the requirements and everything. It should NOT come as a surprise that they're back on X - they've never had an issue with Fascism (or any other ism) as long as they had money to spend on overpriced iron.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 248 points 5 days ago (7 children)
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 71 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And lifting their a## up, so they are better accessible

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 234 points 5 days ago (3 children)

“X’s owner now has the ear of the president-elect, a man who has a long history of helping his friends, and punishing his enemies,” said Max Willens, senior analyst, at Emarketer. “Sending at least a trickle of ad spending toward X may be seen as good for business, albeit in an indirect way.”

There's the article in a nutshell. Give Elmo money or face the wrath of the Diaper-in-Chief.

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 101 points 5 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 178 points 5 days ago (8 children)

IBM helping out the Nazis is pretty par for the course

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 32 points 5 days ago

Still, “under $2,000” for a corporation of that size is a surprisingly low amount, compared to the others. Not even worth the negative publicity. Odd choice.

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

When Hitler needed to track the unwanted in his concentration camps, IBM was there.

Today, Trump has selected IBM due to our experience in this field of Fascism.

FYI: while this is not true, I'm sure most Americans will believe it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 71 points 5 days ago

wow who could have predicted this considering they're the same companies who said they wouldn't donate to republicans after january 6th three months before they started donating to republicans again.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 120 points 5 days ago (3 children)

When have Comcast, Disney, or IBM ever have been on the wrong side of history? /s

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Had Kamela won, Musk would have been bankrupt within years, likely in jail too (his own words)

Instead of that, loads of people decided to listen to a fraidster thief rapist, and not vote for Harris.

Now we're here and I'm so so tired.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

likely in jail too (his own words)

Yes, but not for the reasons he claimed.

He would be in jail for actual criminality, not for his political opinions.

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 80 points 5 days ago

Oligarchs get cozy with oligarchs, what a shocker.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

of course they are, they might as well lick his asshole while they are at it. big corporations will always without exception do whatever is necessary to survive.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Good thing everyone is leaving

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 48 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Doesn't matter. They're not doing it to get people to see their ads, they're doing it to bribe Elon since he has actual political power now. Kind of like how oil companies buy ads on news media, even though you don't need to be persuaded to buy oil - it's to buy favorable coverage.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

My electrical utility (PG&E) advertises all the time. Like what am I gonna do, not buy electricity? It’s so obviously just a bribe to the media companies.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's just going to be all brands, nazis and/or bots soon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] madjo@feddit.nl 77 points 5 days ago (4 children)

It’s time to drop Disney+.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Should have 5 years ago. Mostly cause fuck disney, but I get why you had it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 42 points 5 days ago

That would be REALLY Corrupt if simply buying Ads on a Website was Enough to allow you to DIRECTLY INFLUENCE the President Of The United States! Fortunately Trump DIDNT put the Owner of X in charge of Important Oversight Decisions!

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

So pretty much everyone, who's already got a reputation for being shit, or has fallen from grace completely, has returned. No surprises there

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 51 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I almost can't blame them. A majority of Americans voted for fascism and racism. These are their customers.

[–] itsworkthatwedo@sh.itjust.works 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A majority of American citizens who voted...that's an important distinction. Roughly 29% of voting age american citizens and 22% of all american citizens - a sizeable minority but a minority nonetheless - voted for fascism and racism.

[–] j4yt33@feddit.org 26 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Well the ones who didn't vote obviously weren't too bothered by fascism and racism either, apparently

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 29 points 5 days ago (11 children)

ITT: People realising most of the world lives outside their bubble

load more comments (11 replies)

This is bending the knee

[–] MdRuckus@lemmy.world 45 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Horrible timing. Millions are leaving and going to BlueSky.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 38 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Death to Comcast, Disney, and IBM.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago

And nobody was surprised. I predict most advertisers will return by the end of January for the same reasons they left previously: It's the right business decision at the right time. Remember that the next time a corporation makes a pledge. It's always about money.

[–] Tehhund@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago

Did anyone read the article? Besides the top 2, these amounts are paltry:

Data by MediaRadar showed that Comcast, which spent less than $1.5 million on X this year, was followed by Warner Bros. Discovery at $1.1 million, whose ads are supporting theatrical releases of movies, and Disney at under $550,000. Lionsgate spent less than $230,000, while IBM allocated under $2,000.

That's embarrassing.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I dropped Xitter as soon as it became apparent that Elon was going to buy it and started pirating Disney (and everyone else) shortly after. Couldn't tell you the last time I bought anything IBM but I'll have to be more careful about it. I'm switching to a local fiber provider so I'm leaving comcast in a couple of weeks.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›