this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
390 points (80.4% liked)

Memes

45779 readers
2147 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 40 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Him pardoning his son is a giant nothing burger.

Hunter was the victim of a partisan witch hunt that wanted to get him on Trumped up charges (pun intended) because of his last name.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

TRUMP runs on ethnic clensing, claims he won't project 2025, wins, immediately puts authors of 2025 in every key position. Convicted of over 30 felonies, convicted rapist, says ''there will be some hardship'' while selling is economic strategies that will destroy US economy, wants to stop billions a day in trade from Mexico. Refuses to appoint anyone that can pass a background check. Decides he doesn't need to even PRETEND hell be lawful and ethical, caught on hot mic taking about disarming citizens. .

  • soft to no press coverage . Biden pardons his son. .
  • entire newscycle every day dedicated to the ABSOLUTE OUTRAGE this grievous crime is. Now the Presidential office is forever tainted.... . It's hard to even grasp how deeply loyal to Trump these institutions are.
[–] prof_wafflez@lemmy.world 31 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

100%. I'm not buying into this bull shit "be outraged about this" campaign. Trump is a felon rapist and going into the WH again after a terrible first term and he's stacking his admin with unqualified loyalists. I don't care if Hunter was pardoned and no one else should either.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Indeed, it's just the Right Wing Media giving us more "It's only wrong when Democrats do it" bullshit.

The real story shouldn't even be "Biden protects son from Partisan Witchhunt" it should be "Trump returns to White House despite the 14th Amendment saying he can't."

[–] BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

it should be "Trump returns to White House despite the 14th Amendment saying he can't."

I agree, if only there had been someone in charge of a government agency with the mandate to go after people like that, using a system of laws and justice, administered in some kind of court... Ideally someone the offender didn't appoint themselves, with a time period of roughly, idk, 4 years to get it done?

[–] wpb@lemmy.world -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It totally and completely is. I mean, it's immoral and shitty, it's a rich white person getting off because of connections, but that's par for the course. It is expected. The annoying thing though, is the hypocrisy of a lot of the posters here. If Trump did something like this, they would be up in arms about how undemocratic and banana republic-like this all is. And this childish Harry Potter morality which determines how bad a thing is not by looking at the thing itself and its consequences but by looking at who's doing the thing really gets to me.

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Seriously, who cares? Voting this year showed everyone no one fucking cares. If you really care about punishing those who committed crimes, go after the convicted felon that will never see a day in prison. Get over it

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml -2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

And there are tens of thousands of people in his exact position but didn't get pardoned because they don't have that last name.

Like, he could have blanked pardoned that particular crime in general, but I presume that would have been too much paperwork and might have been too close to actually doing something good for his people.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Find me a case of another person being charged with purchasing a gun while being addicted to a drug. Or better yet tens of thousands. You might find someone arrested for attempting to buy a gun while on drugs, but none that reviewed their past logs and tried to find out they were possibly addicted at the time of a purchase of a gun.

It was an investigation that I've never seen anywhere before. Any normal situation and a judge would have dismissed it completely as the person was not on drugs at the time of the charge, nor harmed/threatened anyone with the gun

Note: several judges stated such laws were unconstitutional during the years of the investigation, so any Republican supporting it must admit that States have the right to restrict any and all gun purchases for any and all reasons as the constitution states no such laws pertaining to addiction over lap and gun purchases... Or the law cannot support that case

Sidebar: whatever he did with taxes if it was unlawful and others do get charged with it, sure he should be charged

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 18 points 16 hours ago

Presidents are kings now. Scrotus said so. Blame them.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 8 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

“Hypocrisy isn’t illegal, nor is it particularly unusual in politics,” Stewart said Monday about Biden’s pardon. “It’s not like he’s ever going to run again. So why not take care of your kid, even if you said you weren’t gonna? I respect it. I don’t have a problem with it.”

Suck it whiners.

Go pass your own purity tests.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Democrats can complain, although I'm not a fan of the decision, I get it.

Republicans can go suck a giant dick. You've lost your right to complain after electing a treasonous, orange rapist.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago

Drug addicts get kicked in the face in jail. I guess when your dad is famous and you're not brown, the rules just don't apply.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Given the circumstances, I’d have done the same thing. Under trump’s dictatorship, I’d imagine he wouldn’t have lived long in prison- what with all those…. Open windows.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 22 points 18 hours ago

Given the circumstances, I'd have vastly restructured the entire government using some Official Acts

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 15 hours ago

Is their blood blue?

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 153 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

Biden has always been a piece of shit. That said, he's old, his other son is dead, and his loser son got caught up in a shitstorm that had less to do with justice and everything to do with politics and optics. The country decided that it is happy to go down the a fully corrupt, inept and fascist rabbit hole, and Biden opted to save his loser son and tell everyone to go fuck themselves and go suck an mushroom shaped cock.

but

EDIT: Don't get mad at an old man for choosing to save his son. Be mad at a system that allows a man to abuse his power to protect his friends and family from consequences. For once, a proper use of "Don't hate the player, hate the game".

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 78 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm not surprised or shocked he did it. Only saddened he refuses to do anything else

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (14 children)

ITT: people who wouldn't lift a finger to save their family from a corrupt incoming DoJ

[–] NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

If that was Biden's motivation, then where is Fauci's pardon? Or Adam "Enemy from Within" Schiff's pardon? Or what about Liz Chenney who is supposed to face treason charges according to Trump, where is her pardon? What about Jack Smith, where is his pardon? Kash Patel has an appendix in his book which is a literal enemies and prosecution list, any pardons for anyone on that list?

If Biden was concerned about the Trump justice department going after his political enemies, and Biden wanted to protect those people, there's probably 80+ pardons he should be handing out.

But instead he only issued one. For his son. So Biden is either actually concerned about overreach of the Trump justice department but he's only willing to save his son, and leave everyone else hanging. Or, Biden isn't actually that concerned with the Trump justice department and is just abusing his pardon power to protect his shithead son from the consequences of his own actions. Either way, fuck Joe Biden.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

I'll entertain that argument once he's no longer president and can no longer give those other pardons.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›