this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
3825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nick@midwest.social 1 points 10 months ago

“Becoming”

[–] argo_yamato@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow even nature.com has an article about how bad twitter has become, did not see that one coming.

[–] applejacks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they've been posting their dumb political takes for years now.

You’re aware that Nature is a multidisciplinary scientific journal, yes?

If you’re insinuating that Nature is generally overtly political, you should really see someone to get that cranial-rectal inversion checked out.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is overstated.

In the old days, there was a hierarchy of reputability. At the top you had the bluechecks that generally represented reputable sources of information, who had premium billing in the platform. Then you had the normies. Then you had the slush-pit of soft-blocked people that were shoved into the "other replies" box because everybody hated them and they only followed their network of bots.

Now, the hierarchy is reversed. The slush-pit people are now have blue-checks, the algorithmic boost on blue-checks is even stronger, and half of the old reputable blue-checks have left.

This is like saying "Reddit/Lemmy has always been awful" if we made the upvotes/downvotes of all the worst people on the site worth 100X what a normal person's upvote/downvote was worth. Yes, there have always been problems, but they can get worse.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You must not pay attention, I'm new to Lemmy, but Reddit's been garbage for years. Seems like a lot of that garbage made it's way to Lemmy too. Face it anything that you can hide behind a screen and a keyboard with relative anonymity is fucking shit. It outs people for the kind of person they REALLY are when they don't have to face the repercussions of saying shit to someones face.

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes.

But here's the thing:

Reddit/Lemmy: those people have equal voice to you or me. Of course they can amplify that voice with sockpuppets, but still - one account one vote.

Old Twitter: those people have downmodded influence. Twitter knew everybody hates them and treated them like the garbage they are.

New Twitter: those people rule the roost, because they're willing to pay Elon $8/mo for a megaphone for their jackassery.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

You can pay $8/mo and have your own platform too. What's the issue?

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This isn't pointed out enough, IMO. People act like it went sharply downhill under Musk but this is the platform that enabled extremists for years and only even banned Trump when he literally tried to overthrow democracy. Maybe Twitter was good in like 2010 but I really don't think Musk changed THAT much about it.

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Okay, but the new Twitter reinstated him, and a bunch of Nazis.

I mean, old Twitter was jokingly called "the hellsite" by its users but its new Elongated form is quite a lot worse.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub -1 points 1 year ago

This is

by design