this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2024
106 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

77635 readers
2811 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 56 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So its social media without the social part?

[–] VubDapple@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

It's para social. The person consuming it feels as though they are part of a relationship. EFIT: like TV but more interactive.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 17 points 11 months ago

Damn, we're refining Fahrenheit 451's "Families" already.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 10 points 11 months ago

Parasitic more like.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

maybe the most raw form of corporate media

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why would anybody want this?

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 44 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The line has to go up.

More engagement = more views = more ads = more money for the shareholders

Doesn't matter how that engagement is generated, whether it's human content or AI trash.

Late stage capitalism is hell.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

Science: "Look, we're destroying the earth, and this graph explains it."

Shareholders: "Great job. Now for the next fiscal year, line must go up, so continue what you're doing if you want to keep your job to survive, else, we'll take our money and give it to someone who can make the line go up."

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that what Facebook is already?

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 2 points 11 months ago

But now they can directly sell the AI manipulation instead of watching others sell it.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

Eventually, it will be all AI-generated users, selling AI-generated products to each other and Zuck will no longer have to pretend to be human.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Owen noted that while AI characters could be a “creative new entertainment format”, there was a risk that they might flood platforms with low-quality material that undermines creators’ craft as well as erode confidence among users.

"Hey, humanity, how's it going?"

"The world's most technical minds have found a way to make social media worse just to squeeze out just a little more profit"

"Jesus Christ"

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Dead Internet Theory on purpose.

[–] Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

For facebook that's a good thing lol

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Typical of Meta to steal an idea from every social network on Earth, including its own, and make it 90% bots. They haven’t had an original idea since pokes.

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 18 points 11 months ago

Literally the dead internet theory

[–] wintermute@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 11 months ago
[–] will_a113@lemmy.ml 15 points 11 months ago

It makes me think of Fahrenheit 451 where everyday people would sometimes become bit actors in these long form tv/hologram shows and describe the other actors as their friends and family, even though they never actually interacted beyond the scripted bits.

[–] j4yt33@feddit.org 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Headline sounds as if they want to replace all the users with AI

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 6 points 11 months ago

In their defense, it should make the numbers look good.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 11 months ago

Even more reason for staying as far away from anything meta/fakebook

[–] DesertDwellingWeirdo@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Politicians and corporations will be able to pay and use these bots to influence users on policy and politics like they would with advertisements. They're cutting out the shadowy troll farm and PR firm middlemen.

[–] Rekall_Incorporated@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

They will use still use bot farms, but they become much more automated and effective . Doubt PR firms and influence peddlers are going anywhere.

[–] Eggyhead@lemmings.world 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Imagine training an AI of yourself and gifting it to your grandma to hang on her fridge.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

No, I don't think I will.

[–] boatswain@infosec.pub 2 points 11 months ago

If we're really lucky, maybe they'll patent the idea and then everyone else will have to stop doing it.