this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
954 points (98.3% liked)

Memes

47087 readers
1022 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Devide

verb

Obsolete form of divide.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 55 points 1 month ago
[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

First you need to stop money from systematically flowing to the top or that dividing is only going to be a temporary measure.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)
[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I'd argue there should be a flat out cap on wealth. Nobody should have 500 billion dollars. Not sure what it should be, but somewhere under 500 billion.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Would be nice, would still require a revolution.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago
[–] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

You can have a soft cap with higher taxes as wealth goes up.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To name a few:

  • the classic riot, violence and/or revolution
  • the coup
  • organizing through unions and have general strikes until things change
  • sustained peaceful protest
  • voting
  • switching to a different (underground) economic system
  • massive emigration

All come with some serious downsides of course.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (12 children)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Would require either revolution or threat of it to pass to a meaninful degree.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CyberMonkey404@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not "their" money. It's our communal wealth, stolen and privatised

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

It's 100% their money. They control its rules, and it's designed to make them rich at our expense. Their money is part of how they steal our wealth.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The rich will just come up with clever ways to get paid that avoids paying tax.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Land value taxes are immune to tax evasion. It's assessed by the state instead of declared by the taxpayer.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

People here use farm land to pay less tax, ie for inheritance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Isn't that what taxation pretty much does? Takes money and redistributes it?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Not in the US at the federal level. Taxes are an anti inflationary device when dealing with a sovereign currency. It's the last step of the fiscal year. Step one is literally printing money, step two is distribution of those funds, step three is to allow the money to circulate between businesses and people, and then step four at the end of the year is to levy taxes to combat inflation. They used to literally burn the dollars they collected, now they just zero out an entry in a ledger.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

but how will we pay for <anything that's not increased military spending>???

talk about social services and taxes are like a bake sale, talk about funding war and it's what you describe

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's more due to political will, than the economics of the system

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

oh competely agreed, I'm just pointing out the dishonest framing by politicians and pundits

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

Ostensibly, but if you ask any billionaire about it they'll just suppress a laugh

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I suppose OP is proposing a wealth tax.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

I think it's more about Socialism than taxation.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes, but I'll do the dividing. Just trust me on this one

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Stop letting them borrow against it.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, no, no. Just like a tax on unrealized gains is a bad idea because of how much it would royally fuck up the stock market, including every 401(k). What they need to do instead is tax the ways used by the extremely wealthy to utilize their gains without technically realizing them, even if that sometimes means taxing debt (aka treating it as income when they borrow against it and taxing accordingly).

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Yes, changing the status quo is going to require some sacrifice. But we have more to gain by seizing their wealth than we do by protecting our crumbs.

[–] MrMobius@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isn't that the definition of taxation and redistribution of wealth?

[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes but if we can't spell divide I'm not sure I'd hold out hope for nuanced or accurate political commentary.

[–] plumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What have we got to loose?

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We half nothing too loose but our chain’s.

[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I had multiple involuntary physical reactions to that sentence.

You win.

[–] MrMobius@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

No need to shame people for their spelling. You never know, the person in question might not be a native english speaker or could have dislexia.

Everyone in this thread should support an inheritance tax

It is not a "death tax" it's a tax on unearned, undeserved income

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

But their nephew’s painting on the wall is worth a million bucks.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Come on man you can’t even spell divide

[–] Hamartia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Devide

verb

Obsolete form of divide.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago
[–] Frog@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I came here to lead, not to read!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

It's better to jail them, what's the point of having money in bank accounts if you can't access it?

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Yes, the same people who couldn't get past the DNC to get Bernie nominated are certainly going to ge able to redistribute all the wealth.

[–] Schal330@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How about capping the amount they can earn above their lowest paid employee? For them to rise they have to take everyone with them

[–] Hamartia@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

They'd just 'devide' up their businesses into a chain of symbiotic entities defined by paygrade. Then the executive level can enrich itself insulated from us front line grunts.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Or to be realistic, maximum ten times more.

Let people dream a bit!

load more comments
view more: next ›