this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
35 points (85.7% liked)

Technology

60528 readers
3830 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 45 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Case in point, Microsoft's water use shot up from 6.4 million cubic meters in 2022 to 7.8 in 2023, in large part due to the "construction of more data centers."

By way of comparison, the California almond industry uses 3.5 billion cubic meters of water per year. Describing datacenters as using "astronomical amounts of water" is a plain and simple lie.

Moreover, datacenters can be cooled with water that's not suitable for most other uses. Google's Finland datacenter is cooled with seawater, for example.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 22 points 10 hours ago

Their refusal to admit the problem will be the doom of us all.

[–] zapzap@lemmings.world 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

There's so much hand waving and speculation here. For example, the amount of water that Microsoft uses to cool its data centers is a global number right? Not California specific. And for that matter, if those data centers are in the Bay area that's not going to matter for firefighting in Los Angeles, I wouldn't think. AI makes for kind of a convenient scapegoat right now.

Also, I thought we were blaming the fires on climate change and DEI?