this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
26 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3199 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
26
As Twitter destroys its brand by renaming itself X, Mastodon user numbers are again soaring | TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Frostwolf@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It's not just lemmy that's benefiting from Elon Musk.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure there were a huge swath of people who used Twitter and didn't care at all about Musk one way or the other.

Then he rebranded and threw his ego and control in everyone's face. And all the people who like Twitter IN SPITE of Elon were now forced to acknowledge that their Twitter is gone.

Just like over at reddit now, the latest move has alienated the people who really cared about the platform itself. If they rebranded to "Spez's World", though, a lot of the people who didn't give a shit before would suddenly be ready to bail.

[–] o0joshua0o@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He has so thoroughly ruined Twitter that you can't help but wonder if that was his goal from the outset.

[–] Username02@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Narcissists like him would never seek failure intentionally.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You've obviously never played a board game with a narcissist. Flipping over the table and calling everyone, including the game they themselves purchased, cheaters is a totally expected move.

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're not doing that to lose. They're doing that because they already lost.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I GUESS YOU'RE RIGHT, LIKE YOU ALWAYS HAVE TO BE!

- Knocks phone over -

Fucking cheaters

[–] appel@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To what end, though? The man blew 44b on a site that apparently was only worth 5-10b, and that was before he ran it into the ground. He also destroyed his reputation and the mystique as "genius entrepreneur" which the world can now clearly see he never was.

I can't think of a single net positive. I think it's an age old tale with people with too much money: he fell victim to an over inflated ego and too many yes men aiming to please. He started to believe he really was brilliant.

Sad thing is the man has so much money he still can't fail, personally. He'll have destroyed Twitter and even more people will lose their jobs. And autocrats around the world will be pleased. Musk will just shrug, tell himself it wasn't his fault, "it was the libs" or something, and move on.

Eta: the only winners here, as per usual, are the shareholders.

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

44b sounds like a lot of money (it is!), but his net worth right now is 219b after this fiasco. At this point it's just a score between rich assholes who got the bigger number.

You could take 200b away from his evaluation and he could still retire on a yacht and not work a single day in the next 100 years. Same for his children and his children's children.

So yeah, "bad" financial investment, but it might be worth for him to kill one of the biggest platforms where he was called out for his bullshit.

[–] kaba0@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That 44b had to be paid in real cash, not just the current theoretical value of the sum of his shares. He sold quite a lot of Tesla shares afaik to banks to give them a “small loan”.

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Lol, "real cash", look it up what he actually did. He took a loan in the name of Twitter, so he didn't even use his own money. Pretty much financing half of the deal with the theoretical value of the company he just bought. And he took in extra money from Saudi investors, it's not all his money.

There was never a 44b "real cash" transaction.

[–] ngons@feddit.nu 1 points 1 year ago

Is this migration already called xit? Because it should..

[–] TypicalHog@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

IMO X is shorter, easier to say and cooler. I like it!

[–] Tygr@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s not the rebrand that’s killing Twitter. Elon is. He’s proving to himself that he cannot, in fact, run Twitter better than the prior owners.

[–] hairinmybellybutt@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if previous twitter execs are feeling a bit bad to have sold him twitter to see it destroyed like that.

I mean it certainly proves Elon is an idiot as he used fraud to manipulate the price and got played instead.

But was it worth it to let him destroy Twitter just because he tried to defraud it?

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

They got $44 billion, double what sane people thought the company was worth. It would be irresponsible not to take Elon for a ride.

[–] Desistance@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lemmy would be soaring too if it weren't for terrible database code allowing for easy ddos.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hopefully they can fix that issue and the communist communities stop having hissy fits.

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

they're prob ddosing themselves for failing the purity tests.