this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
1430 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

66067 readers
4694 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SirFasy@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Not surprising, Google is an ad company at this point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 12 points 21 hours ago
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 369 points 1 day ago (10 children)
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 84 points 1 day ago (22 children)

Cries in only Chrome and Edge at work 😢

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 77 points 1 day ago (9 children)
[–] takeda@lemm.ee 64 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah. What company wouldn't allow it?

When I was working for an ad exchange, everyone had adblock installed in their browsers, I found that quite ironic.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 58 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I would argue it's a security issue not to have any ad blocking. Many scams online start with popups or fake ads.

So if you get the opportunity to talk to IT that's what I would mention.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] micka190@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

Yeah. What company wouldn’t allow it?

My IT department uninstalled it from my work laptop, and told me not to reinstall it because - and I quote: "The only browser IT officially supports is Google Chrome."

What makes this doubly stupid is that I'm a web developer. I literally can't test my stuff on another browser...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] kane@femboys.biz 7 points 20 hours ago

I stayed away from Chrome alternatives, as it had the best Canvas/HTML5 performance (Which oddly enough, was quite important for most of my browsing needs). However, this news means I will have to switch. Installed Firefox for my primary browsing needs, and a few Chromium-based ones to try out for specifically the aforementioned use case.

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Yeah, I heard someone say a week or so ago that they straight disabled it in the browser, and now only the gimped version that works with Manifest V3 works now. Thankfully I switched to Firefox when all this Manifest V3 stuff was announced. As far as I know it's the only browser out there that isn't based on Chromium (which Google also controls, so browsers like Brave will likely be affected by this soon as well, unless a bunch of those smaller browsers get together and fork Chromium and maintain it themselves, which I'm not very hopeful about) and so doesn't have to worry about these shenanigans.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It is 100000% a reason to split Chrome and the ad sales part of Google into different companies.

It won't solve the problem but the pressures end up being orders of magnitude different.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 11 points 1 day ago

Always have

[–] FreddyNO@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Didn't consider chrome before and still wont

[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

That’s fine. Google can go fuck themselves

[–] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 91 points 1 day ago (10 children)

But ublock origin lite is by the same dev.. Not as many features but it conforms to the new rules and is still much better than not having a blocker if you use chrome or edge.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 84 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Missing critical features:

Filter lists only update with the extension, you cannot update them dynamically

No making your own filters and thus no element picker for blocking annoyances on a webpage (a feature so good apple literally baked it into safari)

No support for external lists (which means if you back up your own filters into a list you cannot easily reimport)

No changing behavior on a per site basis

A number of other features as well that are more strictly power user features but still really handy like dynamic filtering and strict blocking domains.

If you have the option stop using chrome and edge, they are some of the worst options you could choose. Even outside of adblock and manifest v3 chrome is horrendous for data harvesting bullshit and edge isn’t great. If you don’t have the option because of an overzealous it dept or whatever and are forced to use it ubo lite is your best option probably and my heart goes out to you

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Iamaquantummechanic@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Have never used Chrome. Firefox is very good. I had 5-6 years when I preferred Opera, but since 2014, I've been using Firefox exclusively.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›