this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
788 points (99.6% liked)

Memes

49758 readers
1522 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hux@lemmy.ml 41 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Nah, it would never happen.

We would end up with comprehensive gun control reform before we ran out of our precious billionaires.

[–] ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 5 days ago

So reduce their numbers and get gun control. What's not to like?

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Americans would finally rise up then.

[–] Paddy66@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago

According to Ray Dalio, you're right - that is what it will take: revolution or a major war https://youtu.be/BB2r_eOjsPw

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

win-win, you say

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 43 points 6 days ago

Most transformative two months the world would ever see

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Well, kinda...due to inheritance, it'd kinda be like the Lernaean Hydra.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ok so it’s just a math problem, then. Inheritance is taxed and incurs other costs, so there’s some re-distribution. Plus with multiple heirs, the estate may be divided.

So keep shooting for another couple of months. I’m just saying, it’s totally doable, it will just take a bit more effort.

[–] tonywu@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

This might be the trickle down we’ve all be promised.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Isn't there some depressing statistic about 2nd and 3rd generations losing most of the fortune or at least losing any control over it.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

went take a chance? ammo maybe cheaper than eggs in the US these days.

[–] orange_squeezer@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

There is, but it's basically made up to support the notion that it's very difficult to stay rich. It's actually very rare for subsequent generations to lose inherited wealth, it just gets partitioned out so there are dozens or hundreds of rich people instead of one disgustingly wealthy individual.

Similar to lottery winners losing everything, it makes a much bigger headline when one loses everything despite it being incredibly uncommon.

[–] almizilero@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If billionaires got shot as often as school children, only billionaires would be allowed to have guns within a week ...

[–] misteloct@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

"Think of the Children Gun Safety Reform Act", a 1,000% tax on guns. Guns now cost about $10-100k each.

We could handle this in minutes or let it drag on for years.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago

Two month? I think in less than 2 weeks.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

No you don't understand they sacrifice dozens of kids every years to guns because they need guns to resist tyran- oh... NVM I guess.

[–] ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

Billionaires also have far better security than an off-duty or retired PO