this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
227 points (99.6% liked)

Not The Onion

15915 readers
470 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The people need to arm themselves

[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Stockdale was also Ross Perot's vice president running mate in 1992.

He lost points in the vice presidential debate that year when he flat out stated he wasn't ready to comment on a specific question (I don't remember the topic). Kind of a nice summary of the issues with our elections in one sentence, isn't it?

[–] gargolito@lemm.ee 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

He came across as a dotard in his first debate by opening with "Who am I? Why am I here!?" Instead of answering whatever the question was. I don't remember the topic either but it was one that a VP candidate should have known about. Similar to that libertarian candidate a couple of campaigns who that asked "what's an Aleppo?"

[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 3 points 8 hours ago

Oh that's right, I forgot about that first question!

[–] klu9@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Somehow I completely missed that of course Perot must have had a running mate. Thanks for the info.

[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I was in high school at the time, taking Current Events as a class. Our textbook was Newsweek, then a fairly respectable news source.

It was a good year to take it - the 1992 elections, the Branch Davidians, and probably a few other things. We all wrote down our predictions for how the Branch Davidian situation would end, and we were all wrong. (I do not recall my prediction.)

[–] klu9@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

I never would have predicted the cultists' compound would now be at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue...

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's too early to tell if the Streisand Effect will play this one out. My vote is FOR! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

[–] klu9@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

I think the Streisand Effect might have worked for just one or two books. But they banned 381.

https://media.defense.gov/2025/Apr/04/2003683009/-1/-1/0/250404-LIST%20OF%20REMOVED%20BOOKS%20FROM%20NIMITZ%20LIBRARY.PDF