this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
560 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

70298 readers
2856 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Microsoft has no soul. I'm going to guess that Google will follow suit. There is no class solidarity quite like corporate class solidarity. Fuck all these companies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (12 children)

So that's why Gates said he would donate money once he dies

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (7 children)

He said that he was giving away 99%+ 30 years ago, it's just publicity stunts, or as Kyrgizon explains below they "give" things to nonprofits that they control. Why? They no longer pay taxes. So nice!

Bill gates is another billionaire mentally ill evil crap person, no different than elon or zuckenberg etc.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

lame. The web versions suck.

[–] JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought from the headline that it was just a downgrade to Business Standard, no this is to Business Basic! That's a huge yikes, it's so much harder to be productive in those web versions.

I honestly would not be surprised if users work out installing LibreOffice et al. so they can still have a desktop app experience because of this move.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder if the amount of SharePoint storage will be impacted by such a license chance too. One of my clients at work will be very unhappy with these changes especially if it means they have to buy more SharePoint storage

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yet again, I laugh, and remark 'People still use Windows? People still use MSFT products?'

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Sadly. An example: I work at a small school that does not have an IT department. Staff and teachers are nearly IT-illiterate, and the students can hardly be coaxed to do stuff on a laptop instead of their phones. So installing Linux would add an additional hurdle for both. Probably much smaller than they think, but still: it heightens the threshold to even consider switching to Linux.

There's a few people who know that Linux is just as valid as Windows, but who would they trust to make the switch safely. Me? I'm not a professional. So they'd have to pay someone, properly. And then it all comes down to money again which usually comes down to "let's not change anything".

So for now I'd just be happy if they used LibreOffice instead of MS365.

The same goes for Google Workspace. Making the effort to roll your own (totally possible with FOSS) would require to pay at least 1 person, and some sort of transitional period. It's cheaper and easier to pay none and just blame it on Google when things don't work as desired. These people just don't see it as a priority. Don't understand the dangers.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Was gonna say this is exactly why Chromebooks and Google docs is popular.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's really no competitor for large orgs with robust technology needs.

[–] homesnatch@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

There are absolutely large orgs in the Google and Apple ecosystems. My org, for example, doesn't use Microsoft except for a smattering of Excel and Word subscriptions to deal with some customer documents that aren't handled well by Google Docs and Google Sheets.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah, anyone who uses Excel on a professional level can tell you Google sheets etc are NO substitute for Excel. Just so many things the competitors just can't do

[–] homesnatch@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For financials, only the companies still in the dark ages depend on Excel rather than real ERP or accounting software.

Sheets handles pretty much all typical business needs, but we do run into issues if we're collaborating with another company that is using macros or something in Excel.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But can you also get all the enterprise features they have with Linux? Like, backups, mobile device management, identity and access management, MFA? All integrated tightly and easily deployable from a portal?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

scream in John Malkovich's voice:

"FUCK MICROSOFT"

On the flip side, please keep digging yourself in a hole, Microsoft. More incentive to join Linux for us users.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Charlxmagne@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Micropenis still thinking they can use their "monopoly" to their advantage is cute. Js giving Linux and other competitors a higher marketshare for free

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›