this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
304 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

70980 readers
3649 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At first glance it looked like the robot has a tail. That would be cool and seems like it might help somehow. Add a tail!!

[–] andybytes@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Pass the blunt

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

the robot got stolen

[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

I hate that!

[–] embed_me@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Like Marty in the grocery store, a waste of space. Get out of my way, Marty!

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Why is everyone here so negative about this? This is pretty cool!

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 5 points 1 day ago

Presumably because it's Amazon doing it. It is quite reasonable to have a general level of distaste and suspicion for tha company

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

Because I've seen this movie before, and it did not turn out well for the humans.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Technological unemployment is only going to get worse without a plan to support the people being replaced by automation. They can't just 'get another job'. As long as the benefits of this stuff only goes to shareholders, it can fuck off.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

And the sooner the better.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

It's called structural change. And I don't see why it's a bad thing. We would still be plowing our fields with ox and cart if we had denied every technological unemployment in the past.

Delivery jobs are the most ungrateful and exhausting low-paying jobs. And you want humans to keep doing them for the rest of mankind's future? Pretty grim future in my opinion.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No. I don't want them to starve when they get replaced by robots, which is the current plan, apparently.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well if you're ignorant enough to think things will stay the same for the rest of your life while digitalization is ramping up... With all respect, who's at fault here?! Just diversify and find different avenues.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] vane@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are trying to solve last-mile delivery problem

[–] andybytes@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are wasting tax payer dollars

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Tax payer dollars? Also, why waste? It might pay off with more efficient and cost effective delivery. R&D is never a waste. You can't tell if something will work if you haven't tried.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›