this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
153 points (98.1% liked)

Not The Onion

18051 readers
1291 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ignirtoq@fedia.io 58 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“Generally, what happens to these wastes today is they go to a landfill, get dumped in a waterway, or they’re just spread on land,” said Vaulted Deep CEO Julia Reichelstein. “In all of those cases, they’re decomposing into CO2 and methane. That’s contributing to climate change.”

Waste decomposition is part of the natural carbon cycle. Burning fossil fuels isn't. We should not be suppressing part of the natural cycle so we can supplant it with our own processes. This is Hollywood accounting applied to carbon emissions, and it's not going to solve anything.

[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Waste decomposition is part of the natural carbon cycle

Partially true. Factory farm animals are not natural.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know, animals sound pretty natural to me. Maybe the walls aren't, but I don't think that's what you meant

[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Majority of livestock animals would not survive without humans.

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

But their shit comes from plants and they get their carbon from the air.
The unnatural additions to that cycle are fertilizers (more nitrates than normal) and complex organic chemicals (pesticides, antibiotics, ...). The carbon cycle is undisturbed by them.

[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

Vaulted mixes the waste, including everything from biosolids and manure to food scraps, into a sludgy cocktail, then injects it into deep geological formations sealed off from the surface.

we're literally turning our world into a shit sandwich.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Can I donate a turd to their door?

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

As long as it's delivered by hand from about 10 feet away.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Hell with donating, I wanna get paid!

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Headline is lying. This does not do that. Carbon offsets don't work.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago

Yes, they did in fact buy shit

[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

Well, to be precise - if you say you do A to get B that only says something about your intention. So the headline isn't really lying, they're just saying what Microsoft is wants to achieve. I agree they will not achieve that goal because carbon offset doesn't work.

[–] Wooki@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Literal Greenwashing.

Could easily do better.

Step 1: plant forests Step 2: lobby for the protection of existing forests including the one just created.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

Step 3: stop wasting our resources on running a glorified predictive text algorithm.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago

Coming soon to Office 365

[–] Angelusz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're all being negative and funny about it, but have you considered you may not know better than hundreds of actual scientists?

I'm just saying, this shit is indeed hilarious, but I'm thinking they're on to something.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the point most people are trying to make is that the pollution should not exist in the first place, and also that carbon offsetting doesn't work as advertised.

[–] Angelusz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I understand that perspective and do not subscribe to its logic.

[–] grob@mstdn.social 1 points 1 month ago

@hellfire103 article is aptly filed under "Entertainment", good to see professionalism is alive and kicking