this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
18 points (73.7% liked)

Games

20611 readers
504 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brot@feddit.org 47 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It still makes no sense at all. Those handhelds are openly sold at Amazon, even from European warehouses. If you want to prevent the selling of ROMs, you have to tackle this problem and not some random YouTuber who maybe linked to a few Romsites or sold some via Telegram.

[–] Sirence@feddit.org 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Easier to go after one guy then after a Chinese company

[–] brot@feddit.org 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Amazon is not a Chinese company.

[–] Sirence@feddit.org 18 points 3 days ago

Oh I assumed you wanted them to go after the manufacturers as they are the root of this practice. But I'd assume they'd rather go after any Chinese company then try and go after the moloch that is Amazon.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Big whoop. He linked to ROM sites on his blog. You can still buy those consoles (and rom packs) from Amazon who’s actually profiting from all this

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

He was selling them outright via Facebook / Telegram. I’ll speculate a little bit - it’s likely it wasn’t taxed which is why he was singled out.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago

ahh, missed that. That makes more sense

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So more a tax issue / income gap rather than copyright infringement?

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 days ago

No idea but in Europe copyright law doesn’t seem to be enforced as much against little guys but taxman will come for everyone. That YouTuber seems to be a grifter, collecting money for his defense while also making money off a Telegram shop. He knew he could make things up and people (and „journalists”!) would fall for it because Nintendo bad.

[–] B0NK3RS@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

It sucks that they are being singled out but when you publicise links to copyrighted material you are asking for trouble.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

He did nothing wrong.