this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
849 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

73379 readers
4237 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 hours ago

China Laughs Communistically

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 159 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 6 points 15 hours ago

Just needs a Union Jack on his hat and the wrapping paper and "UK" in place of "US" on the box.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 59 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe if they see significant issues with the populace adhereing to this law they should identify the solution of revoking the unpopular law.

[–] Konstant@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago

It's the populace that is wrong, not the lawmakers /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 51 points 19 hours ago

"We will force you to do what we want", democracy in action

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 144 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

This ends with just another war on encryption.

When encryption is legal, they can't know what is going on between two points. They going to make is so we can only have encryption to nodes they trust?

It is dangerously technologically illiterate to wage war on encryption.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MU5T4N6@feddit.org 14 points 16 hours ago

Labour was supposed to destroy the Tories, not join them!

[–] KonnaPerkele@sopuli.xyz 203 points 1 day ago (6 children)

This kinda proves that it was never about the children. How many children have know how and the means to buy a VPN subscription?

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

A lot more than you know, I knew how to use it since middle school.

And if they don't know they will use Reddit to find out how to access the sites:

https://reddit.adminforge.de/r/teenagers/comments/tv70x0/do_yall_know_a_good_vpn/?

https://redlib.baczek.me/r/teenagers/comments/1m7bp6b/turns_out_its_comically_easy_to_bypass_reddits/?

Don't underestimate kids.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 45 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Still an important part. Free VPNs that spy on you are a thing, but work

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

And there's the other shoe dropping with VPNs now. Didn't even take them an extra fucking year

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 17 points 17 hours ago

Didn't even take a week.

[–] JustTheWind@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Just adopt a CCP style social credit system already. Why all of this pussyfooting around being a totalitarian, censorship focused, surveillance state? Just do it. Give the good people of UK a solid reason to be a little bit more French again.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 9 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

There has been a widespread misconception that China operates a nationwide and unitary social credit "score" based on individuals' behavior, leading to punishments if the score is too low. Media reports in the West have sometimes exaggerated or inaccurately described this concept.[4][5][6] In 2019, the central government voiced dissatisfaction with pilot cities experimenting with social credit scores. It issued guidelines clarifying that citizens could not be punished for having low scores and that punishments should only be limited to legally defined crimes and civil infractions. As a result, pilot cities either discontinued their point-based systems or restricted them to voluntary participation with no major consequences for having low scores.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit_System

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 13 hours ago

This is, if true and accurate, delightful news! And has improved an otherwise troublesome day.

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

What about all the people blocked from air travel due to low Social Credit? Are you saying that never happened?

[–] yogurt@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

People can be banned from airlines but they get banned for the same reasons they do in the US, like getting drunk on the plane and punching someone. Or like how the US bans people who owe child support from getting a passport, judges in China are allowed to ban people with unpaid child support or big enough unpaid fines from state owned airlines until they pay.

[–] febra@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

So now it's not just TERF island but also nazi island.

[–] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

As a Brit I'm sorry for how embarrassing our country's authorities are becoming

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

Banning VPNs is quite a serious move.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 318 points 1 day ago (24 children)

Just to fast-forward this dumb cat-and-mouse thing, the next step is people go back to torrenting their porn and deeper down the rabbit hole of garbage "free" websites skirting the rules.

As always, the UK is useful on the international stage because sometimes you need to be able to point at some idiot trying dumb stuff to explain to people why dumb stuff is dumb.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

There are ways around this even if they do ban vpn. Its a hopeless battle being fought by the ignorant.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 12 points 15 hours ago (12 children)

I mean anyone can rent a server in Europe and install OpenVPN themselves. Hell, it doesn't even need to open OpenVPN, Wireguard works just as well and is basically undetectable.

Eat shit, UK government, for real. Idiots think that by speaking the same language as US fascists they can have similarly dumb ideas.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

wireguard is not undetectable, even wireshark has a simple way to identify it, but there are more accurate ways

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 51 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I’d email my MP to ask why this Labour Government is using the BBC to promote Reform talking points and implementing brain dead Reform policies, but I don’t expect anything other than the blandest party line response.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 33 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Labour are not governing for the people, and they are not the Labour party anymore.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They're Labouring very hard for the corporations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 40 points 22 hours ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›