this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
1033 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

73503 readers
3222 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 25 points 4 days ago (12 children)

Couldn't people just hire a VPS in another country and VPN with that using Wireguard etc, or even use RDP etc to it? Is it even a VPN if you're remotely operating a computer in another country?

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Refer to other comment. They don't see "VPN traffic", they see encrypted tunnels between two ports to some offshore vps. At best, they see a header saying "openvpn". The article is alluding to the country effectively wanting to crack down on encrypted tunnels (because you cannot discriminate VPNs from them). At best, maybe they're just christofascist idiots.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] WaffleWarrior@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I though the UK was a Western democracy. What the hell are you guys doing over there?

load more comments (1 replies)

labour really doesn't want people to access lgbtq safe spaces and resources huh?

[–] Luouth@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Bye bye UK economy. How do you expect businesses to work without VPNs?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] PushButton@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

The Collective Shout Out must feel envious of such power... Think about all what they could ban, you know, for you and your children protection of course.

[–] febra@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (4 children)

So now it's not just TERF island but also nazi island.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] krigo666@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago

Ah, fascism on the rise.

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Banning VPNs is quite a serious move.

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Freenet, I2P and Tor will be the new refuge

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The UK government doth protest too much about protecting the kids. It’s obvious that this whole thing is just an attempt to increase the surveillance of the UK population.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Will the next step be banning VPS then? Because that's what will happen: if you ban VPNs (good luck with that lol), people will just connect to a VPS in a less stupid country and exit from there.

I hope they start looking at TOR too, that should be really fun.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›