this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
276 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

17667 readers
748 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] edg@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Why don't more people think the UN is cool? It's like the real world Federation of Planets. Yes it's largely ineffectual as a tool of meaningful change, for now, but it's aspirations are epic and beautiful. Just look at the Universal Declaration of Human Rights!

https://youtu.be/hTlrSYbCbHE

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The UN is largely ineffective due to the security council. The fact that one country can effectively shut down a vote is the opposite of the Federation of Planets.

Now that I think of it, of course the UN is ineffectual. It's set up like the US system of legislature. A powerful smaller body that is largely disproportionate to the rest of the world fully controls everything the UN does.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, it's much better than the alternative of said country starting nuclear war to get its way.

There's also the Uniting for Peace resolution.

[–] edg@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's a victim of our reality and can never be anything more without a lot of work from a lot of people who have equally bold aspirations.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because all the agressor countries have veto power on anything, aka it's a useless organisation.

[–] enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Without that, the UN would be even more useless. It’s a discussion forum, not a federation. You need to have ”evil” at the table. And nuclear capable evil won’t sit at the table unless they get a big veto to swing around.

But they are in fact at the table. Communicating. Most likely in bad faith, but still communicating and talking.

[–] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Every time someone says "but the veto powers!!!" I like to helpfully point out the league of nations

Its a failed experiment. It had no real backing and thus has no real power.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 25 points 2 weeks ago

I read them, UN.

So there's at least one more!