this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
57 points (96.7% liked)

Selfhosted

51489 readers
294 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I tried self hosting it,but it felt very resource intensive on my vps. It's a really good bookmark manager, feature rich and all. But I feel like it could have been lighter.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Linkwarden has pretty minimal hardware requirements - it was tested on a VPS with 4gb of memory and it ran pretty smoothly, the most intense part is when you build the app, but once it's running it's relatively lightweight.

From their website. I wouldn't consider tested on 4gb vps having minimal hardware.

I use Linkding and I am very happy with it. Less feature? Maybe. But it's a bookmark sync. What do you need?

[–] alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A bookmark sync. Thanks. I'll check it out.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

If you just want to sync bookmarks I don't think linkwarden is what you want. Maybe floccus? I'm going to check out linkding that someone else mentioned because using git to sync floccus is broken on mobile platforms.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

LOL if 4gb of memory is pretty minimal I am curious to know that they think to be resource intensive.

The maximum memory I am willing to allocate to a lxc container dedicated to bookmark management (=something that I access twice a month) is 256mb

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

4gb isn't so bad for a build, but wtf does it need to just run smoothly?!

[–] Wistful@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago

I use Linkding too, it's very light and it's great, I only wish it had the exclude tag filter and no tag filter. That would make it perfect.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's intensive because its trying to archive the links and spends a lot of ram doing so.

It's more like a replacement for pocket.

[–] BinaryUnit@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Before I started to host a bookmark service i made some investigation, and the final dockerized contenders in 2023 for what relates to memory were:

Shaarli: (~ 50Mb of RAM )

Shiori: ( ~30Mb of RAM but lacks quite some features)

linkding ( ~200Mb of RAM)

In the end i went with Shaarli

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I guess my question would be what are your resources?

[–] alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

2 Gb ram and 2 CPU cores... I know it ain't much, but I was not expecting a minimum requirement of 4 gb

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 4 points 2 weeks ago

I have it running on an old Dell quadcore workstation with 16gb of memory, alongside around 30 other Docker services including a full Servarr stack, and haven't noticed any issues with it.

[–] oyzmo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Runs smooth on my old qnap 453 :]