this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
548 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

74921 readers
2812 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I think 8k has a use, just not in consumer televisions for things like Netflix or gaming. 8k's real use is most likely in the medical field where high high high high detail is extremely important.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 4 days ago (8 children)

How high detail if 300 dpi is already almost impossible to separate into dots for a human eye?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

Why would the medical field need 8k screens? They can just zoom in on a lower res display y'know? Nobody is looking at a screen with a magnifying glass

I think a possible application for 8k displays is the huge displays where the viewer is extremely close to the display. But that would still just be the same pixel density as a lower res display.

Another area I think high pixel density might be useful for is patterning. Like PCB manufacturing and other photoresist stuff. But that's a problem already solved by much cheaper technologies

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fuzzywombat@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

What's your opinion on using 8K TV as a monitor?

https://daniel.lawrence.lu/blog/y2023m12d15/

[–] derry@midwest.social 12 points 4 days ago (8 children)

4k ought to be enough for anybody

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Who is out here filming at that resolution anyway? Cannot fathom the file sizes of anything made for these TVs

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 11 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Yeah, no shit. The only possible use is gaming, and even PC owners have been upscaling for some time now.

The only case where you might even notice a difference by going to 8K resolution is high end VR, but that's no reason to have 8K in a TV.

Even 4K is overkill for most movies. The HDR is the selling point there, which I'll admit looks nice.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I would be fine with an 8k TV if there was 8k content and they were affordable. I haven’t purchased a TV in over a decade however and my TVs all work fine so I’m not even in the market

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I work off metered data. I’m happy with 360p.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Here I am still downloading the 720p versions of movies and not minding at all. If I want hyper resolution imagery I just go outside.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Resplendent606@piefed.social 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'm happy with 1080p content. I have a 4k TV and from the couch I can't see a difference. I would be perfectly happy with a bargain 4k TV, bigger the better.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›