this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
594 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

74983 readers
2907 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Note: this lemmy post was originally titled MIT Study Finds AI Use Reprograms the Brain, Leading to Cognitive Decline and linked to this article, which I cross-posted from this post in !fuck_ai@lemmy.world.

Someone pointed out that the "Science, Public Health Policy and the Law" website which published this click-bait summary of the MIT study is not a reputable publication deserving of traffic, so, 16 hours after posting it I am editing this post (as well as the two other cross-posts I made of it) to link to MIT's page about the study instead.

The actual paper is here and was previously posted on !fuck_ai@lemmy.world and other lemmy communities here.

Note that the study with its original title got far less upvotes than the click-bait summary did 🤡

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] trashgarbage78@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

what should we do then? just abandon LLM use entirely or use it in moderation? i find it useful to ask trivial questions and sort of as a replacement for wikipedia. also what should we do to the people who are developing this 'rat poison' and feeding it to young people's brains?

edit: i also personally wouldn't use AI at all if I didn't have to compete with all these prompt engineers and their brainless speedy deployments

[–] GlenRambo@jlai.lu 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The abstract seems to suggest that in the long run you'll out perform those prompt engineers.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

How does it suggest that?

[–] trashgarbage78@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

in the long run won't it just become superior to what it is now and outperform us? the future doesn't look bright tbh for comp sci, only good paths i see is if you're studying AI/ML or Security

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] trashgarbage78@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

so avoid LLMs entirely when programming and also studying AI/ML isnt a good idea?

[–] mp_complete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Probably studying AI/ML or security is a fine choice if that's what you want to do. But if you want to go into CS, it's probably not a bad choice to do. IMO it's much less likely that AI will completely replace all or even many engineers (or people in other industries).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] veebee@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

I mean, that’s not surprising.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What a ridiculous study. People who got AI to write their essay can’t remember quotes from their AI written essay? You don’t say?! Those same people also didn’t feel much pride over their essay that they didn’t write? Hold the phone!!! Groundbreaking!!!

Academics are a joke these days.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago

Ok, if the ai knows

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (19 children)

And using a calculator isn’t as engaging for your brain as manually working the problem. What’s your point?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I went over there with ideas that it was grandiose and not peer-reviewed. Turns out it's just a cherry-picked title.

If you use an AI assistant to write a paper, you don't learn any more from the process than you do from reading someone else's paper. You don't think about it deeply and come up with your own points and principles. It's pretty straightforward.

But just like calculators, once you understand the underlying math, unless math is your thing, you don't generally go back and do it all by hand because it's a waste of time.

At some point, we'll need to stop using long-form papers to gauge someone's acumen in a particular subject. I suspect you'll be given questions in real time and need to respond to them on video with your best guesses to prove you're not just reading it from a prompt.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] darvit@lemmy.darvit.nl 0 points 1 week ago

Good article.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Don’t worry scro

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›