this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
314 points (99.1% liked)

Selfhosted

51782 readers
964 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kossa@feddit.org 4 points 23 hours ago

Question for the Immich users: if I have two users A and B, who share all pictures. Can user A create an album with pictures from user B? That doesn't work with Nextcloud and is grinding my gears!

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I've never had any issues with the old setup oddly enough, they talk like it barely functions lol

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

The app can be basically unresponsive (my experience) as it's checking to make sure everything is synced. It's gotten much better over the last few months and the beta experience was wonderful it just broke (app side) a few times and told me an asset wasn't uploaded even though it was.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I had issues uploading big files to it due to it stopping uploading once app is minimized. As long as app is open on screen, it would upload files with no interruption. New version seems to fix this issue for me.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Interesting, background sync was completely broken on the new beta timeline for me. I had to open the app, and disable then reenable sync every time I had new photos.

I'm back on the old version because it's basically 100% reliable.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

I had same issue gut relog helped to fix it

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago

Me too, and the new one I didn't even realize this change happened. I saw there were no breaking changes, updated, and saw "oh, it isn't synced anymore" so I reselected the folders, it ran a sync check on everything, which took a while, and everything works fine again.

I didn't even realize there was a difference until now, but I guess there is a start/stop sync switch.

[–] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Any users here mind sharing their experience?

[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

Immich is great. The iPhone app is not trustworthy with syncing photos and always freezes. It will get there eventually, if you have the patience for crashes on the iOS app. In fact, for the last week the app just hangs on open, which usually means I need to re-install the app and all that. I have a large library of over 60k photos/videos and an older phone, which doesn’t help. Despite these issues, it’s still great. Every other feature works flawlessly. I haven’t tried this new update but I am hopeful and glad they are pushing forward with cleaning up syncing!

[–] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 40 points 1 day ago

So far, so good? The initial rollout was rough, and the app kept reuploading my whole album and then realizing it was already there.

But since the flurry of hotfixes, its been smoother sailing

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Running minipc with immich pointed to NAS drive with photos. I had issues with uploading files in the background on previous version but it seems to be fixed right now.

[–] NinjaTurtle@feddit.online 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Can't really comment on the older versions since I recently deployed the server. However from the past couple of updates, the background syncing has improved on the Android version. Before I had to open the app for it to sync but recent updates now upload media without me having to open the app.

For the app itself, works pretty well. There still seems to be bugs or weird UI changes like adding to albums disappeared when you click a photo or video but its there on the grid view if you hold the file.

Overall it seems pretty stable and it has a dedicated app in both iOS and Android. Use to use nextcloud with memories before.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

The Android app finally works the way you'd expect it. The UI no longer lags due to syncing. Syncing is much faster and more reliable.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My use case:

I use a Synology NAS to backup my photos/videos. On mobile, I use the Synology Photos app for 100% of the backups, because it's been 100% reliable for me over the years.

I basically run Immich in read-only mode, and specifically for searches. The contextual search is incredible, and after putting it side-by-side with a very expensive Windows software that uses local AI search, it came out on top... no contest.

So in that sense, I'm very happy!

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Silly question, how does immich read from NAS? Is that a native functionality or do you mount it in docker?

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, when you mount the external library (when setting up docker), you can set it as read-only. 👌

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] randombullet@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I run it on a VPS. Works great across oceans. Biggest gripe is that it doesn't load local content first. It checks online and then pulls from those thumbnails. So if you have a weak or slow connection, then you'll get a spinning wheel of death or assets that don't load properly.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] randombullet@programming.dev 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Client side or server side?

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 2 points 10 hours ago

Client side, under advanced:

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well after reading this I just went to open the app and it now things none of my tens of thousands of photos are synced to the server, yet the sync icon at the top says there’s nothing to sync. So… not great today lol.

Overall it’s been a very buggy experience for a long time and evidently that’s not about to change anytime soon.

[–] hikaru755@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

You might have to sign out and then in again. There was a bug with the initial release that caused this kind of behavior

[–] Lem453@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm on version 1.143.1 I skipped all the beta timeline stages and updated from 1.135 I think.

About 30k photos and 2k videos

The web interface was great, the android app (pixel 8) was very slow. Even local assets were slow.

Since update, its way faster. Feels really good, responsive, low latency. Sync and backups have been no issue at all.

Sync on android turned itself off after updating, but I turned it back on, selected the same folders to watch and it processed for a few mins and then everything continued to work with no issues.

On the previous version, sync was pretty good. Sometimes it didn't trigger as a background process and i had to manually open the app but it worked. New sync also works well though haven't yet uploaded a large number of things.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Does the app clear storage space on your phone ever? Last I looked, it only mirrored pictures to Immich, so everyone’s phone eventually fills up storage. Had to stick with Nextcloud because it deletes after uploading.

[–] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

You can, manually. Sounds worse than it is.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

It doesn't actively delete but there's an option to delete from device

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 15 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Anyone know of a good managed hosting (or vps) for Immich that doesn't break the bank? I have about 5TB of photos/videos and I don't feel safe without a remote backup. I played with self hosting and I really (really) like Immich but I keep Google photos/Drive just to ensure I won't lose anything.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 25 points 1 day ago (15 children)

Continue to self host, create a yearly backup on external harddrive which you keep offline at a trusted family members house.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 7 points 1 day ago

I do something similar


I have a raspberry pi and a HD, with daily rsync and snapshots (monthly retained indefinitely, weekly retained for a month, daily retained for a week). It's at family's house, connected to my home via WireGuard via a VPS. Tailscale (or anything really) would also work here.

It's a great setup! Just have some watchdog reboot if it can't talk to home (a simple cronjob with ping -c1 home.lan || reboot or similar).

Even our "slow" 35Mbps upload speed is way more than enough for incremental rsyncs of my Immich library. The initial sync was done in person, though.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Local storage on a VPS is expensive, and I've never been happy with a lower powered server serving media. Personally I self-host and send a backup to Backblaze B2 for offsite (using Rclone).

I use Borgmatic for incremental, deduplicated backups but make sure you save your encryption key somewhere you can access it if your house burns down.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chisel@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you're fine with self hosting, you can just self host it and backup your local drives to a remote location. That's what I do.

For backup software, I use Duplicacy. But Veeam, Borg, etc.. would work just fine. For images, since they're just static files and you don't really need a version history, you could get away with a scheduled rsync job. Though, technically that leaves you more at risk of ransomeware or something that overwrites your data.

For remote storage, I'd first consider a Hetzner storage box since they are flat-rate pricing and pretty dang cheap at $13/mo for 5TB. You might also consider StorJ, B2, S3, etc... I'd just stay away from any lesser known ultra-cheap storage providers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] derry@midwest.social 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Happy to share my experience. Pros: capable replacement for Google photos, Face recognition, location map, etc Support for albums and sharing. Support for reading folders from local network

Roll the dice on these, YMMV ( there are not really cons to me but I work in tech and deal with far worse things)

Actively being developed. Good- things are fixed, new features added. Bad, have to update the server regularly , multiple times some weeks.

Cost: free. You get what you pay for. There's a donation cost, and I've been meaning to do that, but for free you may not get the help like for something you pay for. They do have an active community on Discord, so there's that.

Editing in mobile client only.

Exposing to the Internet seems a bit tricky if you plan on doing it right ( securely) but you can use tail scale for external access, works fine.

I've been happy enough with it to turn off my google photo backup . Oh they do warn you to not to use this as your main backup since it's under active development. Something what to consider. Hope this helps, happy to answer questions

Edit: cleaned up grammar for clarity

[–] suzucappo@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The only caveat I see is updating the server/app regularly.

Updating is definitely recommended for sure but I find myself waiting between updates. I'm still running 1.134.0 and have been for a while just because I'm not having any issues and haven't gotten around to it.

I agree with everything else here as I have had the same experience.

Edit: This recent update I will likely update to though.

[–] derry@midwest.social 7 points 1 day ago

If you're just interested in the synch part, I've been using it without any issues for several months. Worked in a pixel 6a, upgraded to a pixel 8 pro and continued right where I left off

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tuckerm@feddit.online 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm using immich and really like it, but I'm not using the Android app. I have synthing on my phone, and I let syncthing send the photos to my server. Then Immich detects the files in the syncthing folder.

Is there any benefit to using the app? Or would using the app be basically the same thing that I'm doing now?

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The app let's you see/search all your photos, I have a ton of photos not on my phone.

[–] tuckerm@feddit.online 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, gotcha. That's a use case I hadn't thought of. Mine is just the photo backup for my current phone, so when I have my phone with me, I can see all of the photos on the phone itself.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 14 hours ago

Yeah in that case the app is just handy for searching or viewing photos by face.

[–] SavoryBaconStrip@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

The app is pretty similar to Google Photos. You can search locations, people, etc. It's cool and works well enough, but I just use it as a secondary backup. Google Photos is still primary for me for now. I'd recommend giving it a try though. You can use the app without syncing anything just to see what it looks like first.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm really happy to see this post acknowledge speed issues where there are many items, 100k+. I have around this and have always found Immich to be laggy, while others say how it's the fastest ever.

I will have to give it another go.

[–] cron@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think this feature is live yet, looks like it still needs some internal refinement. At least nothing like this was mentioned in the last few changelogs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›