this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
42 points (100.0% liked)

Games

21500 readers
179 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

A group of investors including private-equity firm Silver Lake and Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund could unveil a deal for the publisher best known for its sports games as soon as next week, WSJ said.

It's always the Saudi's.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

It's always saudi in philadelphia

[–] icylobster@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

A group of investors including private-equity firm Silver Lake and Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund could unveil a deal for the publisher best known for its sports games as soon as next week, WSJ said.

Is there a way to get a list of the top company's involved? I'm curious who the owners would be. This implies it would mostly be Saudi Arabia, but it isn't clear.

[–] shani66@ani.social 1 points 17 hours ago

That's good! There's now a slim chance they'll do better in the future

[–] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago

Not sure why; being publicly traded and their valuation because of it is the only thing keeping them solvent.