this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
400 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

76008 readers
2660 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _NetNomad@fedia.io 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

i think about this every time i open outlook on my phone and have to wait a full minute for it to load and hopefully not crash, versus how it worked more or less instantly on my phone ten years ago. gajillions of dollars spent on improved hardware and improved network speed and capacity, ans for what? machines that do the same thing in twice the amount of time if you're lucky

[–] socialsecurity@piefed.social 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well obviously it has to ping 20 different servers from 5 different mega corporations!

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago

And verify your identity three times, for good measure, to make sure you're you and not someone that should be censored.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

These aren't feature requirements. They're memory leaks that nobody bothered to fix.

Yet all those examples have been fixed 🤣. Most of them are from 3-5 years ago and were fixed not long after being reported.

Software development is hard - that’s why not everyone can do it. You can do everything perfectly in your development, testing, and deployment, and there will still be tonnes of people that get issues if enough people use your program because not everyone’s machines are the same, not everyone’s OS is the same, etc. If you’ve ever run one of those “debloat windows” type programs, for example, your OS is probably fucked beyond belief and any problem you encounter will be due to that.

Big programs are updated almost constantly - some daily even! As development gets more and more advanced with more and more features and more and more platforms, it doesn’t get easier. What matters is if the problems get fixed, and these days you basically wait 24 hours max for a fix.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You can do everything perfectly in your development, testing, and deployment, and there will still be tonnes of people that get issues if enough people use your program because not everyone’s machines are the same, not everyone’s OS is the same, etc.

Then you didn't do it perfectly did you?
Works on my machine is no excuse.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Who said “works on my machine”? Not me. You can test it on a hundred different machines and OS versions and it’s flawless on them all, and you’ll still get people having errors on their machines. I feel like you must have thought you found a “gotcha!” and just stopped reading my comment, because I explained why.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

"Perfectly" is a strong word, so I wouldn't subscribe to this.

But it's impossible to test software on all setups without installing it to them. There's endless variation, so all you can do is to test on a good portion of setups and then you have to release and some setups will still have problems.

The only way to guarantee that it works on every customer's device is by declaring every customer's device as a beta test environment, and people don't seem to like that either.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›