This kind of shit will only increase as more of these companies believe they can vibe-code their way out of paying software devs what they are worth.
this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
491 points (98.6% liked)
Selfhosted
52403 readers
1975 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Why do we place so much reliance on one mega company? This level of importance. It should be seized by the government.
Do you really want someone like the magahats having control over something like that?
Why do we place so much reliance on one mega company? This level of importance.
Because it's cheaper and (in broad terms) more reliable than everybody having a data centre.
It should be seized by the government.
Oh yeah, what could possibly go wrong if the US government owned Amazon!
Best alternatives is making Amazon something owned by the people and not any corporation/government but who knows if that would ever happen
So, you changed one cloud provider to another...
But let me rephrase: cloud can be significantly cheaper - if you know what you're doing and what you're putting on the cloud.
I've been to data centres that cost as much as a decade of cloud hosting the service they were supporting (and that's without operational costs).
Cloud is especially great for small businesses where you have two alternative options: either build your own data centre which you absolutely cannot afford (or risk making it barely operational and unreliable) or host your company at someone else's DC - which is what cloud is, but worse (because nobody can set up so much resiliency and have so many DC techs/admins as Microsoft or Amazon).
There absolutely are situations where self-hosting is preferable, and even cheaper, but wondering "why do we place so much reliance" on cloud service providers just shows that people have no clue what cloud actually offers.
Leta give it to Trump and Elon Musk, they will take good care of it... Lol.
Trump will isolate aws to America only, claiming other countries are ripping him off.
Aws becomes American Web Services.
Put tariffs on everybody who doesn't host US data on their own cloud services.
Yeah. :) 100% tariffs on data transfers out of American Web Services...
It should be seized by the ~~government~~ people and mercilessly decentralized.
Agreed same for Facebook then call it Readabook
load more comments
(1 replies)
AWS aggressively pursues high priced and years-long spending commitments with large customers, and they incentivize it with huge discounts for doing so.
And when AWS does this they intentionally incentivize these large customers to migrate existing workloads away from other cloud service providers as well, going so far as to offer assistance in doing so.
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(19 replies)
It's wild that these cloud providers were seen as a one-way stop to ensure reliability, only to make them a universal single point of failure.
It's mostly a skill issue for services that go down when USE-1 has issues in AWS - if you actually know your shit, then you don't get these kinds of issues.
Case in point: Netflix runs on AWS and experienced no issues during this thing.
And yes, it's scary that so many high-profile companies are this bad at the thing they spend all day doing
Netflix did encounter issues. I couldn't access it yesterday at noon EST. And I wasn't alone, judging by Downdetector.ca
load more comments
(12 replies)
load more comments
(12 replies)
I hate how Signal went down because of this... Wish it wasn't so centralised.
My friend messaged me on Signal asking if Instructure (runs on AWS) was down. I got the message. That being said, it's scary that Signal's backbone depends on AWS
Why is this scary? That's what e2ee is for, so that no one besides your recipient can view the contents of a message. It does not matter which server is used. If anything for a service like Signal, you want a server with high availability like AWS, Azure, Google Cloud or Cloudflare.
Scared because it's centralized. If Amazon decides that it wants to shut Signal down, they can. Nobody can spin up a Signal instance and help out.
I would be surprised if Signal didn't have a contract with another cloud provider as well, incase of this sort of thing.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I have been able to use Signal like any other day. I haven’t seen any disruption in sending or receiving.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(7 replies)
according to that page the issue stemmed from an underlying system responsible for health checks in load balancing servers.
how the hell do you fuck up a health check config that bad? that's like messing up smartd.conf and taking your system offline somehow
If your health check is broken, then you might not notice that a service is down and you'll fail to deploy a replacement. Or the opposite, and you end up constantly replacing it, creating a "flapping" service.
Well, you see, the mistake you are making is believing a single thing the stupid AWS status board says. It is always fucking lying, sometimes in new and creative ways.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›