this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
972 points (97.7% liked)

Not The Onion

18455 readers
1241 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

It really sounds like somebody in the Queen Creek School District wanted to make a political issue out of him. Presumably, as cited in the article, the state law they pointed to enacted in 2022, which mandates that school sports teams must be designated “based on the biological sex of the students who participate” in the sport. It doesn't matter where you are in the political aisle, it's pretty shameless to exploit this politically, even if it's just so they can go "look at how senseless this law is!" by making an issue out of its strictest interpretation.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 46 points 3 days ago (7 children)

What a USA thing to do. Holy shit.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 71 points 3 days ago (7 children)

The district pointed to a state law enacted in 2022, which mandates that school sports teams must be designated “based on the biological sex of the students who participate” in the sport. A federal judge blocked enforcement of that law in 2023, but only against two trans student-athletes who filed suit against it. (An appeals court upheld that injunction last year, and the Supreme Court declined to take up the case this summer.)

Any chance this is some malicious compliance?

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 3 days ago

It's really a no win situation though if the boy complies. Newsmax will show footage of a game he plays in as evidence that boys are playing in girls sports, and the idiots who watch will believe it and support even worse politicians and laws.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 67 points 3 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 64 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

If that were me, I’d start wearing skirts and mascara. Let my nails grow out, tweeze my asshole, shave my treasure trail into a facsimile of a set of ovaries. Pitch my voice up, incorporate the words “bitch” and “tea” into my daily vernacular. Cry after sad movies and even harder after happy ones. Entirely unrelated to the article, btw

[–] Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone 52 points 3 days ago

Take your pills, Alice.

[–] wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)

At that point, don't you just start using the girls facilities to try and force the issue? The girls would get their parents to complain a "boy" is in their bathrooms and delaying gym by waiting for him to use the locker room. How incredibly asinine that a doctor is not enough to assert the kid's gender to their administration

[–] Sirdubdee@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Demand the school install a urinal in the ladies room.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That’s not a bad thing. He’s going to have a lot of girlfriends

[–] Magnum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

No he will get made fun of from all the other kids

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Girl changing room as well?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 32 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Laker Jackson “has been enrolled in QCUSD since elementary school and has been registered as a biological female throughout their time in our district,” the district’s statement read in part. “The day before basketball tryouts, the parent submitted a new birth certificate and a doctor’s note indicating a gender change. Our schools rely on a student’s original birth certificate at birth to determine athletic eligibility [....] We informed the parent that documentation such as a chromosome analysis could be considered to help support or verify eligibility in accordance with policy.”

Becky Jackson told KNXV that the cheapest option for genetic testing her family was able to find would cost them $1,500 — with no guarantee that her son would be granted eligibility. “So who’s going to pay for that?”

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›