LifeInMultipleChoice

joined 1 year ago
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Once again, they don't remotely (pun intended) have that capability, and how do you plan on them not tracking it back to you? Much easier to use one of the possible 500m guns in America.

Your idea gets a high dollar investigation into how it happened. With the company at risk for millions/billions in losses looking for the culprit. It's all nonsense.

I'm sure it varies by location but deaf/hearing impaired people can get a driver's license. Usually requires they wear an aid, or have full view mirrors if they are completely deaf.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

It's so much easier to get away with shooting someone than this. Also internet going out wouldn't cause the car to stop.

Edit : Not to mention the person can still get out of a car

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah, this is still to high, but 46k, solid battery with 620 miles hitting the market now means it's likely we'll see them showing up in western markets soon. Hopefully once mass production starts we'll see prices dropping https://newatlas.com/automotive/im-ls-lightyear-solid-state/

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I think Hondas may be LFP, not sure. Solid state batteries shouldn't be expensive in 5 years though. I understand they may be today. But like buying SSD's for computers it isn't worth not having one now.

Also I imagine Honda is definitely in the game of trying to make a lower price model, as they would want to compete in markets overseas as well.

180,000 rides a week happen right now using this practice for Waymo right? They are just copying the practice. 0 cars are being driven by remotely people to and from places. It's fear mongering. If a car gets stuck because it's sensors believe something is in front of it, it will stay stopped and flag a handler to evaluate. The person will say your fine move forward or tell the vehicle to stay where it is until someone moves the shopping cart someone left behind it. Once moved, they'll re-enable the car and it will go on its way.

If there is actually something wrong like someone rear ending it at a stop light, then they may put it into some liml mode, give it a parking lot close by to pull into while they watch, then turn it off to await someone to show up and assess damages.

It's a taxi, you pay a fare. That's how taxis work.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's not how any of this works.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yarp. This all being sensationalized before we see the actual product and see how it is being implemented. They aren't remotely driving cars at 50mph down a highway, they are going to remotely tell the car to pull over when someone puts a cone on the hood at a stop light as a prank, or if it gets stuck where it believe it may hit something in every direction, where it is stopped and someone will evaluate the risk via the cameras and guide the car in the best direction. So likely you need 1 person for a very large number of cars.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I made a joke yesterday about Bezos and Metaverae getting integrated into government processes like the DMV and the first 2 ticks were down, I was like oh boy, here we go haha

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Ah, by the looks of how many people downvoted you there I think it must have been missed. I wanted to be sure so I figured it best to just inquire and find out if there was something I was out of the loop on.

 

Does this burning at 200 j/g really mean it would be a lot safer or do you chalk this up to be company propaganda. Clearly it is a lot lower than gasoline, but since 600-900 proved to still be an issue, could this be enough to stabilize people's fears you think?

 
 

I recently read through this and was just curious what others thought the pitfalls or unforseen issues might be with quickly or steadily transitioning to such in a fairly environmentally friendly manner.

Hate the title name, but I think I have to use the article title as the title.

view more: next ›