this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
149 points (98.1% liked)

Games

21894 readers
284 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive

Today, as part of an updated FAQ aimed at workers (spotted by Game File), EA said that its impending $55 billion sale to a consortium that includes Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund will not come at the cost of creative control. If you take EA at its word, I have a bridge to sell you.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 18 points 10 hours ago

Every single merge that has ever announced this, turned out to be wrong

What’s the difference aside from racism? filthy rich and immoral white billionaires own EA vs filthy rich and immoral brown billionaires own EA?

All these companies are shit

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 18 points 12 hours ago

EA saying that line for years about stuff they buy and ran into the ground makes this pretty amusing.

[–] dumbass@aussie.zone 28 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Hmmmm tough one this one, do we want EA to maintain creative control?

[–] AngularViscosity@piefed.social 15 points 12 hours ago

Can we get a third option?

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 10 hours ago

AKA 'executive meddling'.

[–] Mighty@lemmy.world 22 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

We'll see if the next FIFA still has women's teams /s

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 15 points 12 hours ago

I googled out of pure curiosity and found that the Saudis have a women’s football team.

Maybe Qatar doesn’t?

[–] Drbreen@sh.itjust.works 15 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It takes a lot of work to redesign the sportsball logo and pricing chart every year.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 2 points 4 hours ago

Most of EA's creativity is spent trying to find new definitions to gambling so they can keep make gambling games without being regulated.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 7 points 13 hours ago

Do I want EA to keep making garbage and dark patterns in game? No. Do I want them chopped up in box or one the other attrocities attributed to their new owner? Also, more emphatically no.