this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
186 points (98.4% liked)

Games

21894 readers
294 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive

Today, as part of an updated FAQ aimed at workers (spotted by Game File), EA said that its impending $55 billion sale to a consortium that includes Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund will not come at the cost of creative control. If you take EA at its word, I have a bridge to sell you.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I still think they're gonna patch out LGBT content from Sims 4

[–] reddifuge@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

That will only be a start. Looking forward to Super 3D prophet Mohammed Ark.

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 hours ago

Lmao. Lol even. I will also add a rofl for old times sake.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 25 points 22 hours ago

Every single merge that has ever announced this, turned out to be wrong

[–] dumbass@aussie.zone 37 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hmmmm tough one this one, do we want EA to maintain creative control?

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Given that the alternative is censoring the shit out of Sims 4?

Can we get a third option?

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 4 points 23 hours ago

AKA 'executive meddling'.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 22 points 1 day ago

EA saying that line for years about stuff they buy and ran into the ground makes this pretty amusing.

What’s the difference aside from racism? filthy rich and immoral white billionaires own EA vs filthy rich and immoral brown billionaires own EA?

All these companies are shit

[–] Mighty@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We'll see if the next FIFA still has women's teams /s

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago

I googled out of pure curiosity and found that the Saudis have a women’s football team.

Maybe Qatar doesn’t?

[–] Drbreen@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It takes a lot of work to redesign the sportsball logo and pricing chart every year.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 3 points 16 hours ago

Most of EA's creativity is spent trying to find new definitions to gambling so they can keep make gambling games without being regulated.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Do I want EA to keep making garbage and dark patterns in game? No. Do I want them chopped up in box or one the other attrocities attributed to their new owner? Also, more emphatically no.