this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
42 points (87.5% liked)

Games

16806 readers
939 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 31 points 9 months ago (1 children)

and yet it has DRM to prevent people from skipping past the grind in a pve game.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago

Any form of taking money inside the game is the same abuse.

A sharper needle for smoother insertion is not better.

[–] Blxter@lemmy.zip 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Also from the review I watched there are skins/Armour that give buffs in game that cost real money and guns that can be bought... can be "earned" witch I love but I don't love that it affects game play

[–] CouldntCareBear@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The first one did a really good job of having an interesting range of guns and abilities which were very well balanced. There was no 'best gear'. I'm sure they're able to have things worth buying that don't give you an unfair advantage over people who haven't. It's a morally hazardous area though.

[–] Blxter@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago

It is that slippery slope that I am not ok with. For example I am not exactly ok with other games gives XP boost or weapons, materials, etc in a season pass.

[–] phourniner@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The game is absolutely not pay to win in any way. I don't know where people are coming up with this.

The "buffs" on armor are all the same (seriously, look at all the armor pieces you have), have no advantage over anything, and are more just flavor than anything game breaking or actually OP.

The paid currency can easily be earned in game.

There is nothing pay to win about Helldivers 2.

[–] Blxter@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 months ago

Paying to advance or get "gear" that does anything more than change looks is pay to win

[–] kyle@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Forgive my ignorance, I thought the game was just PvE? So people are paying to advance faster?

[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

There is artificial grind that you can pay past, it also has drm to protect the sanctity of the pve multiplayer according to the devs. Most people think it's to protect the $$ from the microtransactions.