this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
72 points (98.6% liked)

homelab

8286 readers
2 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stevestevesteve@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Thanks, I hate it. Not that free esxi was super great but at least it was something

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I googled "how to migrate from esxi to proxmox" last week. I must be psychic.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The free cut of ESXi was only able to run on limited number of cores, addressed a modest quantity of memory, and lacked many management niceties.

Justin Warren, the principal analyst of consultancy Pivot Nine, told The Register the demise of free vSphere means "Broadcom has pretty clearly signaled that it is no longer interested in smaller VMware customers.

Warren rated the change "another gift to competitors like Nutanix, Scale Computing, Microsoft with Hyper-V/Azure Stack, or Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization (via KubeVirt).

Pre-acquisition VMware proudly touted the 4,000-plus small clouds that ran its stack, and applauded their ability to offer services that hyperscalers could not – especially providing sovereign clouds that lacked the complex legal entanglements that see multinational hyperscalers sometimes beholden to laws of their home jurisdictions.

Meanwhile, the implications of Broadcom's decision to end perpetual licenses for VMware products continue to be analyzed by users.

One VMware consultant of The Register's acquaintance told us the change means some workloads now appear to be cheaper to run on bare metal than under vSphere.


The original article contains 575 words, the summary contains 174 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] sonori@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

I’m amazed it held out for so long. Small stacks and getting people used to useing your tool sounds like a good lon green strategy, and Boradcom doesn’t do those.