this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Games

16796 readers
973 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
0
Starfield user score drops to "mostly positive" on steam (www.pcgamesn.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Art3sian@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love Starfield. My mates love Starfield. It’s Fallout meets No Man’s Sky meets Mass Effect.

It’s just another kick ass Bethesda game in a long list of kick ass Bethesda games IMO.

[–] Poggervania@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Bruh, Bethesda arguably peaked like 20 years ago with Morrowind. Everything else since has been more or less downhill lol.

[–] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ou for fucks sake people, games dont have to be perfect tens Its okay to be a 8/10 or 7/10

[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The funny thing is that "Publisher Bethesda was not permitted to pay additional royalties for the RPG because it scored 84 on Metacritic, according to Fallout New Vegas developer Chris Avellone. It appears that Obsidian's publishing contract included a deal that meant the studio would be issued bonuses if the game hit a Metacritic of 85." scores matter to Bethesda a lot even enough to ruin relationships and screw developers.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand the people who spend a hundred hours on a game to then give it a bad rating, calling it boring. Why don't they just quit much earlier and play Chrono Trigger or something?

[–] lustyargonian@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Plays game for 2 hours, rates poorly

"How can they review it without completing it"

Plays game for 60 hours, rates poorly

"Why are they rating it poorly if they spent so many hours on it?"