this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
766 points (99.1% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

67791 readers
339 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Really need more open journal space.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 89 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This system was set up by Ghillaine, Epstein's child acquisition specialist's, father.

In case you needed insight into the heinous minds behind it

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 month ago

Ghislaine, for the sake of any searches

[–] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 64 points 1 month ago

They made more sense before the internet, when the transfer of information was not nearly as easy. With that being said, there is not much reason for them to exist anymore.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

once parasite like this finds a way to attach itself to a host, it is surprisingly hard to get rid off it. it is basically prisoner's dilemma, if everyone leaves, you all won, but if it is just you who leave, you will lose compared to others. no one wants to be the first to leave and risk losing.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just like lots more parasitic parts of society that depend on the network effect. Amazon, Facebook, political parties, uber etc etc.

[–] pleksi@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 month ago
[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The reason why journals exist is because they're supposed to do filtering of bad papers. Whether they actually do that, of course, is another question. And whether it could be done in a (much) better way than it's currently done is also an important question for academia.

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 22 points 1 month ago

As long as academias obsession with „if you didn’t publish there (for example Nature), your paper is not worth much“ is still going on, nothing will change.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 16 points 1 month ago

We do need a rigorous review process. Just accepting substandard papers and mal attribution from a bum duck nowhere "university" is unacceptable.

That being said the current way of monetization and margins are also bad. And we might need higher standards.

[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

This comic is especially relevant because the academics that hold out the longest are going to be the ones who are hurt the worst.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

Elbakyan, we need you!

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

It's telling that academics are unable to break the dependency when publishing costs nothing and they could print their journals on demand for libraries should anybody need that.

The brightest people are trapped in network effects. To top it off, they all regularly meet at conferences and could allocate one session to decide which alternative method of publishing they want.

Anarchists and Socialists should be deeply worried.