this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
509 points (99.0% liked)

Memes

54155 readers
437 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 109 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The guy who owns the platform and removes things he doesn't personally like talking about free speech. Projection as always.

[–] Screen_Shatter@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

His idea of free speech is child porn, racism, and pro nazi talking points. When it comes to the latter things you have the freedom to talk about these things without censorship from the government, but you also have the freedom to suffer the consequences from the public and fellow citizens, such as being criticized and told to shut the fuck up.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 76 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I couldn't live with myself if I was paying for Twitter. Those folks literally funded the largest and most pervasive child porn operation to ever exist.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Zack had the blue tick way before it was paid feature. I'm 99% sure he doesn't pay a penny for it

Should delete account on the Nazi platform though

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Were OG blue ticks grandfathered in?

[–] lath@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Some. It was a "privilege" kindly donated to the peasants of some renown.

[–] TurkeyDurkey@piefed.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That kind of gives me an idea

What if to get a verified badge, it's multiple users paying for it for you to have. Like fans and stuff. This has some faults of course, but I'm sure the base idea could be worked with one way or another.

Side note: Why are people still using Xitter?? 😭

[–] notabot@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

That would be similar to the "web of trust" approach where users vouch for each other, and you can determine how much you trust someone, or at least their account, based on how many others vouch for them, and much you trust those users.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

To answer your side note, because it's popular and most people are unaware of its dark side.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yep, at least initially

[–] zeezee@slrpnk.net 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

wow bald youtube man is clapping back

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have only seen a handful of YouTube shorts with this man and I respect his opinion orders of magnitude more than I do Musk's.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

His YouTube channel is all about right to repair and he uses most of his YouTube income for manufacturing affordable handicapped mobility tools called "not a wheelchair". He also donates another large portion to libraries and water supplies in Africa.

He seems like a very decent dude based on what he shows online

[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have mixed feelings about the guy. All that stuff is true, but he also bought a Cybertruck.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's true, and he also helped Ridge Wallets give away another cybertruck. Everyone in tech or EVs should say something about how no one should ever give any money to Tesla

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

*kids'

That's the only incorrect thing about the sentence though

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The apostrophe was there originally, but it came off during the bend test.

[–] seat6@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 weeks ago

Posting on a platform; directly supports that platform. People who feel this way (I’m one of them); should really leave these platforms altogether

[–] rickdg@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

This about some app store ban?

[–] C1pher@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Here you see in black and white, that this internet “surveilance” has NEVER BEEN ABOUT KIDS. This fucker makes an app like that, and nobody does anything. X is not block in ANY country, that was behind chat control or any other BS change for “kids safety”.

[–] ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 2 points 2 weeks ago