this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
441 points (96.6% liked)

Not The Onion

20724 readers
1172 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Midwives have been told about the benefits of “close relative marriage” in training documents that minimise the risks to couples’ children.

The documents claim “85 to 90 per cent of cousin couples do not have affected children” and warn staff that “close relative marriage is often stigmatised in England”, adding claims that “the associated genetic risks have been exaggerated”.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 5 points 1 month ago

I don't think marriage is the problem. It's having children

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

On the scale of things, I think this rate's a "who the fuck cares?".

I don't really care if cousins get married. I don't really care if they have kids together. I do care if they have birth defects and we should do things medically responsible to reduce or eliminate birth defects, but the whole cousin thing doesn't really bother me as long as there's no external pressure (like British royalty or stereotypical Southern Hicks).

Who is really that bent out of shape on this and why should we care?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

I think it's just another dog whistle tbh, like caring about animal welfare when it's Halal, or worrying about parking when a HMO is opened.

Cousin marriage is a brown person activity, so suddenly pearls are clutched.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (9 children)

An unfortunate aspect of Pakistani culture that has carried over to the UK.

Families would marry within the family to keep their wealth within the family.

Unfortunately after successive generations, this can cause serious problems.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I won't live in a town that robs men of the right to marry their cousins!

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

What is the rate among the control group?

[–] entwine@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

They add that “any discussion of the potential risks” to a child’s health “must also be balanced against the potential benefits” that come from “collective social capital” of such a union.

I wonder if they're also weighing the societal costs of having potentially serious birth defects in 10-15% of the population?

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Cousin marriage is a heavily exaggerated statistic. Unless it happens many generations in a row the genetic variation does not nearly reach anything representing sibling marriage.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›