foggy

joined 1 year ago
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 57 points 3 days ago (4 children)

"you know how you can't talk to someone on Twitter.com from facebook.com? But you can email from your @gmail.com to someone with an @yahoo.com address?

That's the difference, federated social media is like email in this way."

I'm mostly sure even my elderly parents understood it when I said it...

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Oh, please let me testify. Lmao.

I managed to get Comcast to pay me to use their services for over a year due to thei repeated negligence.

It was almost not worth the monthly support call.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

A popular AI focused YouTuber got a great clip from some voice LLM

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

School.

Hand signals.

No. Permission.

Schools are in loco parentis , and designate how to handle things mime these.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, if CPS isn't involved then this is almost surely a lawsuit.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Homie I'm a millennial and I was able to ride my bike to school in the 2nd grade. Just needed to show them I had a helmet and knew my hand signals. I didn't know my hand signals but my mom told me before I went to take the test.

This probably even mortifies older Gen Z folk.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 98 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I grew up in the 90s.

When we got to 2nd grade, we became eligible to take a road-sign test. (Left, right, stop). If you could demonstrate that you knew what that meant, and show them you owned a helmet, you could then ride your bicycle to and from school.

I was 7.

This was more than a decade after the term "stranger danger" had been seared into the American psyche.

I worry of the future.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed on word fence.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I didn't say to specify a port in the DNS. I just said that it is a way that we can resolve a resource.

In the case of ports we'd configure it through whatever webserver (Apache, nginx, traefik, whatever) configs necessary on that machine. The DNS in this scenario would only be for the machines IP where our webserver then routes traffic to different ports.

I was accounting for both valid setups.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

That suggested, it could be done with ports, or it could be done with separate servers.

Domain.com resolves to 1.2.3.4

www.domain.com resolves to 1.2.3.4:443

app.domain.com resolves to 1.2.3.4:5555

Games.domain.com resolves to 1.2.5.6

Mail.domaim.com resolves to 1.2.7.8

Portal.domain.com resolves to 1.2.9.10

Etc, etc.

view more: next ›