But if they can work twice as long, it's a wash.
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
93 points (96.0% liked)
Not The Onion
20036 readers
1966 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Work harder, not smarter!
A dishwashing machine takes easily twice as long as you to wash dishes.
But it also does the dishes without using as much water as you do.
I wash my dishes in the toilet to save water, and to get more mileage out of the flush after I'm done pooping.
We don't want machines to do our dishes while we create art!
Robots only half as efficient as humans, says leading Chinese producer
Customer: Ok, I'll take two!
I work in the food industry. Our plants have robots. They replaced humans 1 to 1 in areas like pick-n-place: take the food from a conveyor belt and put it inside a packaging.
They can do that really well, but when you try to put them to taste a product, or to inspect the presentation of the product, or to diagnose why that so well functioning robot is not working properly, they will fail miserably.
A robot will only replace a worker that doesn't need to have a brain to do their work.
A robot will only replace a worker that doesn't need to have a brain to do their work.
So... Politicians, CEOs, and immigration enforcement are next then?
Unironically, a CEO, whose job is basically taking shots at spreadsheets would be a good candidate to be replaced. As well as many of the useless managers that only see numbers, not people, and take decisions based on those (frequently with less than decent results).
Yes ai would be perfect for middle management up. Let them vibe code the company can't do any worse than the humans doing it. They dont have to try to move up themselves or make themselves look better so they'll probably make more sane decisions.
Critical thinking is an important factor for humans to do tasks efficiently.
...now imagine building an entire fleet of robots who lack that ability and attempting to perform a 1 to 1 replacement.
(There are definitely places and fields where automated machinery works brilliantly, but places where tasks require fine motor function and judgement generally aren't a good fit)
Ask Tesla about their fully automated factory.
In the late 90s a bot could guess who you were thinking anout based on some questions
Today they can do a bit more that that… a bit more
Wonder how things will be in 2050