this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
1118 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

81907 readers
5040 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Super Bowl ad for Ring security cameras boasting how the company can scan neighborhoods for missing dogs has prompted some customers to remove or even destroy their cameras.

Online, videos of people removing or destroying their Ring cameras have gone viral. One video posted by Seattle-based artist Maggie Butler shows her pulling off her porch-facing camera and flipping it the middle finger.

Butler explained that she originally bought the camera to protect against package thefts, but decided the pet-tracking system raised too many concerns about government access to data.

"They aren't just tracking lost dogs, they're tracking you and your neighbors," Butler said in the video that has more than 3.2 million views.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

the few that do this are the smart ones. I fear the ignorant/dumb wont follow when this story eventually dies

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why anyone ever thinks empowering psychopathic companies is ever a good idea is beyond me. They ALWAYS fuck us over. Every damn time.

[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Cancel prime too

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

The most appalling thing is the advertisers and whoever approved this live in a bubble where people are ok with massive surveillance, and don't imagine people will freak out when they see how Amazon can watch them. At least Meta knows their users hate them but are hostages of their network, that's why Meta buys or crushes competitors before they become too big. I've not seen that since a Ford's VP bragging about how much Ford will know absoltuely everything you do with "your" car (is it really?) and backpedaled live as he realized journalists were horrified. That was a long time ago. Today it's common.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It would be good if they had a way to limit range so it couldn't focus on anything that isn't within 10 ft of the door.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rauls5@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago

Switched to Logitech a while back. Uses iCloud encrypted storage.

[–] Buffy@libretechni.ca 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

WiFi connected cameras were a mistake. Although, if people are going to use these mass surveillance devices, using it to find dogs is great. It needs cat detection too.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›