As Gilfoyle said when he gives his AI permission to overwrite code: "The most efficient way to get rid of all the bugs was to get rid of all the software, which is technically and statistically correct."
A+
this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
323 points (99.4% liked)
Technology
81611 readers
4451 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
As we well know as programmers, technically correct is the best kind of correct.
You know Russ, I've been known to fuck myself.
I can't even imagine the amount of story ideas they have at their disposal now. It really is ripe for a reboot or revival. They were dealing with compression and data efficiency, I think we have surpassed those issues.
Since it ended we have had:
- Crypto currency
- NFTs
- "AI"
- VR
- Wearables
- Hardware shortages
- etc
Except in the show, AI actually solved problems, instead of causing them.
It's not the AI that causes problems. It's the CEOs that INSIST this bullshit needs to not only be part of our lives, but also affect our lives.
We can't buy ram at reasonable prices. I hear storage (hard drives, and solid state drives) are also going to go back to being expensive.
GPUs as well.
This is just like a few years ago when all the crypto bros decided they needed all the GPUs. So prices went from $100 or so, to $700. I've heard of some high end GPUs at tge peak of it going for 3k.
Except this time, when the fad ends, I heard it's going to collapse the entire US economy.
We're being forced to prop up a technology that does not work in the ways they want it to, and never will. It can't. Thats not something a computer can ever do.
It's like saying a plane can fly at 550mph, and a pigeon can also fly. Therefore we're forcing the entire united states economy to be dependant on pigeons flying from New York to Los Angelas in 5 hours.
It can't do that.
So when it fails, it basically creates a global depression.
That's what we're doing here. The CEOs are at fault. The AI itself will only do what you tell it to do.
I'm referencing events in the show.
I've been in the tech/startup world since the early '00s and I can definitively say you best start believin' in Silicon Valley episodes; you're in one.
all the devs at work would talk about how much they love the show.
they all thought they were Bachmans, but were in reality Jareds.
I couldn't watch the show because it was too triggering to me. Imagine working on a team of Jareds...
Personally I always identified with Gilfoyle but knew deep down I was a Richard.
I've had a customer ask for me by saying "get us that guy who looks like Gilfoyle, he's the only one who seems to know what's going on."
Though I am polyamorous, have been associated with the occult, have long hair and a beard, and wear rectangular glasses, so I can understand how they'd be mistaken.
Yeah, first time I watched I was like holy shit, are they filming my life? So much they get right in that show, especially the egos and pettiness
I knew from the very first scene. Some company had just got bought so they had a big party and paid Kid Rock to play. But everybody was in polos and khakis and wanted to have quiet conversations and Kid gave up halfway through the first song.
I was at that party. It wasn't Kid Rock, but I was at that party
These were minor outages. Not excusing AI. Just saying
Except that AWS is (for better or for worse) a tier 1 network solutions provider, in part because of advertised uptime. Due to that, it is possible for a minor AWS outage to result in lack of 911 service in an area, for example. Hopefully they have the common sense to try out these new things on less critical nodes though.
If they don't spread their infra across multiple availability zones, they deserve to die
/s
they deserve to die
yeah but their customers sure fucking don't deserve it.