this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
613 points (97.7% liked)

Fediverse

41999 readers
396 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Important progress has been made regarding bringing MLS end-to-end encryption to the ActivityPub protocol, with developers already building implementations and providing feedback to a future version of the protocol spec.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Steve@communick.news 92 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I thought we already had Matrix

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 95 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We do.

This is for activitypub DMs.

[–] Steve@communick.news 7 points 2 months ago (6 children)

That's what I mean.
The headline is a lie.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 85 points 2 months ago (10 children)

If I say tacos coming soon, it doesn't mean I invented tacos, just that there will be new tacos I guess

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 49 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I heard this is the line for tacos.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lines long as 2, and they only come three ways. Steak, cilantro, lime, cheese with your choice of sauce... Chicken chipotle mixed Mexican blend cheese, and cilantro lime, rice-cauliflower.

Sides are open as a bar, self serve.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whelk@retrolemmy.com 27 points 2 months ago

I'll take one

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 5 points 2 months ago

I, too, am often pissed at clickbaity, exaggerated, deliberately ambiguous headlines.

The subtitle makes it clear though: this is about ActivityPub, which has grown into the #1 federation protocol I guess.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] confuser@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Matrix is decentralized but its not federating in a way like activity pub is doing

[–] Steve@communick.news 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

ActivityPub isn't the only way to federate.
Matrix is federating the same way email does. Anyone can spin up their own server. And if they want anyone can spin up their own software. That's what federation is. Different servers agreeing on how to communicate with each other.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

What??? I thought being part of Federation meant being part of the WORLD WRESTLING FEDERATION!

OOOOH YEAH, SEE I'M ALWAYS THINKIN THINKIN THINKIN, YEAH. AND WHEN IT'S ALL SAID AND DONE, WE DO THING IN THE RING! DIG IT! THE TOWER OF POWER TOO SWEET TO BE SOUR, FUNKY LIKE A MONKEY! OOOOOOH YEEEAAAHHHH!!!!

Pomp and circumstance plays over the house speakers

ELIZABETH!!!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 months ago (4 children)

How so? It's certainly very similar.

The matrix protocol enables federation between different instances running different homeservers between users using different clients.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (5 children)

What do you mean?

And what benefit justifies yet another standard?

[–] VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

In this day and age we need as many open source e2e encrypted alternatives as possible.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And XMPP before it, even for e2ee messaging.
At least this is a slightly different use case.

[–] HailHydra@infosec.pub 10 points 2 months ago

Matrix is a poor choice from a cryptographic perspective. With some serious issues historically (some of which are still unfixed to this day), and an extremely poor response to disclosures.

https://soatok.blog/2026/02/17/cryptographic-issues-in-matrixs-rust-library-vodozemac/

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 59 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Well now this sounds interesting. And I assume it's open source?

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 11 points 2 months ago

It seems so, as the project (Emissary) is using the GNU Affero GPL.

https://github.com/EmissarySocial/emissary

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

🤯 That gave me pause. What made you ask (would non-FOSS even be an option for anything ActivityPub)?

[–] iltg@sh.itjust.works 57 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

this is misleading and sensationalistic. if emissary implements e2ee, it's not "e2ee for the fediverse", it's " e2ee for emissary users". did mastodon talk about e2ee? did lemmy?

also the MLS-in-activitypub draft proposes for trusted key exchange either " trust the server" (lmao), use a centralized key authority (wow) or have users manually verify their keys out of band (so basically use matrix to assure your chat is encrypted). source: https://swicg.github.io/activitypub-e2ee/architectural-variations.html#validating-end-to-end-encryption

fedi devs need to stop clickbaiting, and fedi users should learn a bit more about their protocol to avoid getting misled this way

[–] Abundance114@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I felt like a 90 year old grandma reading this.

[–] gajahmada@awful.systems 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

You and me both.

But after pondering the orbs for a minute I think they're saying, that it's just Emissary trying to get E2EE working and not Fediverse as a whole.

And they follow with some objection with the proposed draft. I can only comment on the 3rd one, it basically mean you need other channel of communication to manually compare fingerprint (i.e via Matrix/Signal) to make sure your activities on Emissary is actually encrypted, maybe lol.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 43 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I have a bit of an issue with the title, considering federated end to end encrypted messaging has existed since, at the latest, 1991.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

MLS will eventually be included in all messengers.

It was initially introduced by Wire as an RFC, but they fumbled the federation by making it an enterprise only feature. Because of that, other messengers will do the federating for them. iMessage, Google Messenger, Matrix, and Germ DM (Bluesky) do or partly have it implemented.

[–] dhruv3006@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

We should always have more alternatives to chose from - good to see so many players.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago
[–] vogi@piefed.social 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Unable to decrypt this message

[–] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 months ago

@benpate@mastodon.technology that's amazingly quick work after just under four weeks. I'm looking forward to the result.

[–] doug@lemmy.today 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Finally I can discuss my scat fetish with my fellow scat enthusiasts away from the prying eyes of the NSA!

Nyeh-heh heh heeh!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Astrius@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Major League Soccer messaging? Let’s goooo

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Why?

What benefit does this have over Signal/Matrix?

The article just says "improvements".

[–] blah3166@piefed.social 11 points 2 months ago (4 children)

why? because it would be cool if only intended recipients are able to view sent messages.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] knova@infosec.pub 5 points 2 months ago

One benefit is that Signal controls all the infrastructure and some people do not like that. Sure, you could also spin up a Matrix home server, but that isn’t an ideal solution for everyone either. Some people want to do messaging via their existing ActivityPub infrastructure and that’s OK.

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 5 points 2 months ago

from what i can tell, mls supports much larger group chats (50k users) whereas i assume signal would struggle.

my chat of 10 people i signal seems just as secure, if i am reading right.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BladeFederation@piefed.social 5 points 2 months ago

Let's gooooooo

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fake journalists not even bothering to google that XMPP exists #10496839485.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is about implementing E2EE directly into ActivityPub, so that has nothing to do with this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›