this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
90 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

68158 readers
419 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] marcela@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 hours ago

Oh thanks, I have been looking for this. Someone referenced this argument but I could not retrieve the exact source.

I expected they would say that "downloading only" is fair use. But they also argued uploading? These girls have gone wild.

I also saw elsewhere that they said "decades-old copyrights law" can't hinder their innovation. And this is what rival capitalist interests manufacturing legal precedent looks like.

[–] black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Can we just do away with the concept of intellectual property yet?

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 24 minutes ago

This is just one industry drinking another industry's IP milkshake.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 20 points 5 hours ago

The older I get the more I lose faith that the concept will ever be used to actually benefit creators.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Well, if Facebook can do it and get away with it, everyone can and should, right?

[–] marcela@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 hours ago

I think that the judge said that the decision does not mean that Meta acted lawfully, but that the authors did not present convincing arguments, and wishes that other plaintiffs will come up with better arguments to set a legal precedent against Meta, who stands to make trillions out of it, and thus can compensate the creators.

Conclusions: Legal torrenting is not in sight because of this. And we watch capitalist accumulation in real time.