this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
92 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

83449 readers
3010 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Conservatives will do anything to avoid building trains.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Or to curtail big business. Somehow the whole pollution and energy use thing is the consumers onus.

It's almost never big business or billionaires with private jets that are called upon to be more frugal.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Water conservation. 80% of water use in CA is agricultural, i.e., Big Ag. Consumers are told to take 60 second ahowers, while water intensive crops like alfalfa are grown on land with senior water rights sold to foreign interests like Saudi and UAE who aren't stupid and have money. The state has a water crisis because it won't involve the heaviest abusers in the solution.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Is IEA a conservative organization?

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 3 points 2 weeks ago

Historically, it has ties to the oil industry. It has pivoted more towards green energy recently, but their interests are still in the production of energy, rather than in achieving the best outcomes for our cities.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Conserving energy?

[–] Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hmm, maybe we just don't go to war?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

But this will hurt Haliburton and Lockheed Matins feelings!

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

It's an AND not an OR. Let's not go to war. Work from home, build public transit and everything else to stop using fossil fuels.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 14 points 2 weeks ago

Great, can they call my employer and tell them that I need to work from home to save the environment?

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Or just build more nuclear and solar infrastructure...

[–] db2@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

People fell for that line in the 1940s, at that time it had some effect too. It's total bullshit in 2026.

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Sure, I would love to work from home. Please convince my and everyone else's employers of that.

But the driving slower thing... people will do a quick calculation: take 5 min longer and save 10 cents in gas? Nah, time is money!