this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
88 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

59210 readers
1323 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kazel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Thanks but i stick to keepass. It does the job

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 3 points 3 hours ago

Yes! Finally one with email aliases.

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 27 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

One thing that jumps out at me reading the readme is the fact that it has a built in email server. Email is hard to get right, and I'm surprised a relatively young(?) project is working on getting all the moving pieces together rather than declaring it out of scope.

It'll be interesting to see how it develops.

[–] Coolkat@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 hours ago

I'm no expert but as i understood, it's the sending part that's tricky to get right. Lots of handshake to handle, all to probably end up in a spam folder or blocked along the way. But receiving from a publicly acknowledged address ? I think it's fairly simple

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

I would never trust a newly written email server and there is absolutely no reason not to use an already existing as a dependency to this project.

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago

Do You know more about the email server part? I understand +addressing but this seems to be more? Do You hand a domain over and it is actually a full MX or is it just an imap client?

[–] DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works 32 points 10 hours ago

Per the github page "With the API stabilized, we aim to have AliasVault undergo a thorough security audit this stage. We have already initiated conversations with renowned cyber security companies who have taken interest in taking this on."

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 31 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Has this been audited? It’s easy to claim that something is secure, but there have been products that made such claims and were trivially exploitable.

[–] jay@mbin.zerojay.com 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The Github page says they are aiming to get one done soon.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 2 points 47 minutes ago

They shouldn't claim that an effing password manager is "secure" until after they've done an audit.

I'll pass, thanks.

[–] absolutetupperware@lemmy.today 6 points 10 hours ago

the true audit is time, unfortunately

[–] Courantdair@jlai.lu 12 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Looks promising! And it's refreshing to see something that doesn't look vibecoded in a week. Couldn't find any AGENTS.md or other AI crap so I could actually try it

[–] Prathas@lemmy.zip 8 points 8 hours ago

They spelled "agents" backwards to throw you off! lol jk

[–] TrumpetX@programming.dev -1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

This is most definitely AI assisted. I won't say vibe coded, but this has the hallmarks.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 hours ago

This is a claim that is meaningless. You can say it about literally any software currently in development, and there is zero way to reliably refute it.

It’s like stating your comment was AI assisted.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago
[–] hellmo_luciferrari@lemmy.zip 16 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'll optimistically sit back and see what comes of this. I'm happy with vaultwarden.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Do you have thoughts on 1password?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I’m curious why you asked this?…

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Aren't both of them password managers? I guess I wonder if someone has a preference for one over the other.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 hours ago

They are, it’s just odd to bring up an unrelated software.

I do use 1Password and like it, but I couldn’t compare it to this one.