this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
80 points (75.6% liked)

Linux

48328 readers
632 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Today i was doing the daily ritual of looking at distrowatch. Todays reveiw section was about a termal called warp, it has built in AI for recomendations and correction for commands (like zhs and nushell). You can also as a chatbot for help. I think its a neat conscept however the security is what makes me a bit skittish. They say the dont collect data and you can check it aswell as opt out. But the idea of a terminal being read by an Ai makes me hesitant aswell as a account needed to use warp. What do you guys think?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UmbraTemporis@lemmy.dbzer0.com 127 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Warp lost me at the account requirement. You're telling me I need to sign in to a terminal? Seriously? Like with an internet connection? Nope. What if I'm opening my terminal to configure my network? Warp seems to be fixing a problem that doesn't exist. I don't think anyone has looked at a terminal emulator and gone "Yeah, this could use AI and a cloud account".

[–] pelotron@midwest.social 82 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"Alright, now that I'm logged in to my cloud terminal account, let me enter my root password for sudo."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Secret300@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I would definitely like an AI to remember some complex commands for me. But something small and specifically trained that runs locally

[–] intelisense@lemm.ee 24 points 9 months ago

I use fuck, it's not ai but gets the job done.

[–] walthervonstolzing@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You can define a bunch of aliases in any shell environment for that. Or use a history manager (a database client essentially) that groups commands you've entered so far based on frequency, return value, working dir. when they were issued etc.

[–] hushable@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Archaeopteryx@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago

I agree with this 100%!

[–] paskalivichi@sh.itjust.works 98 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My thoughts are you can fuck the fuck off.

[–] BOFH666@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Totally agree. People using cli are probably more skilled and their knowledge has been fed into these ai models.

So we will all end up with some mediocre level of knowledge, because the next input for the LLM 's will be more of the some old stuff. Flattening the curve and less innovation and smart ideas.

These kind of "solutions" are for a non existing problem. Looking at the investors, this is only about making money.

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 53 points 9 months ago (1 children)

AI that can auto generate all those command line arguments I keep forgetting? Sure.

Closed source terminal that requires account? No way.

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

And also, like... Data privacy... My terminal commands and command outputs contain sensitive data. Even company sensitive data. I don't want to be liable.

[–] Trent@lemmy.ml 51 points 9 months ago

Absolutely not. And they can fuck right off with that whole needing an account to use a terminal thing.

[–] kbal@kbin.melroy.org 49 points 9 months ago (3 children)

To help make skittish people feel at ease with the concept, why not give it a friendly on-screen avatar? Perhaps something like a cute little animated paperclip.

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I dunno. Maybe an orange dog? Give it big brown ears.

[–] walthervonstolzing@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 months ago

Also animate it at ~10fps, making it visibly sad when it can't retrieve the files you ask for.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago

Throw in a little whimsical wizard while you're at it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kby@feddit.de 9 points 9 months ago

You are onto something here...

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 6 points 9 months ago

I prefer a glowing red dot

[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 45 points 9 months ago

I have zero interest in having AI in my terminal. And needing an account to even use warp is a non starter for me.

[–] Adanisi@lemmy.zip 41 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

So,

This is a proprietary and therefore untrustworthy terminal in a space where virtually all the competition is libre/open source.

It's connected to the cloud, therefore insecure and privacy-invasive as there is no reason for something as basic as a terminal to be connected to the cloud. Who wants their SSH keys leaked? Anyone?

They require an account but don't collect data? Sketchy to say the least, a unique account is the perfect tool to collect data and there is no reason a terminal, the most basic interface to the underlying OS should require an online account. It should be tied to the system. (After further reading, apparently they do collect data by default).

It has a built-in AI autocomplete, because apparently normal auto complete isn't good enough (just wait until it tells you to rm -rf /*).

Yeah, no matter how nice it is, I will never accept this terminal.

EDIT: They also forked Alacritty to create a "demo", they took advantage of a libre/open source project for their proprietary terminal and never did so much as thank the authors of Alacritty. That's scummy.

[–] jelloeater85@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

AI can be neat, but this is a solution looking for a problem, like most AI things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 37 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm neutral towards AI, what I can't wrap my head around is forcing users to sign in / sign up to use offline apps. Fuck you too, Postman.

[–] electricprism@lemmy.ml 33 points 9 months ago

Big fat N-O

[–] jwt@programming.dev 33 points 9 months ago

For me to even consider using AI in my terminal, it'd have to meet a couple of requirements:

  • needs to be open source
  • needs to be run without network access
  • needs to be an extensible utility to any terminal program.

(And that's off the top of my head.)

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The terminal seems like the very last place I’d want A.I. I’m usually using it specifically to be precise and don’t just run commands I don’t understand. If you forget some long command, just use history |grep whatever and see what it was. (And then turn it into an alias or function.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

What's my thoughts? My thoughts are FUCK relying on the internet for basic things. So no "AI terminal" for me. This is yet another way to mine data cloaked in futurism.

[–] vhstape@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a major security risk. All it takes is one "hallucination" (and an overly trusting engineer) from the latest and greatest bullshit generator to compromise an entire network

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 15 points 9 months ago

Nice idea for fun and diversity (you can't prohibit people to make such apps after all) but in daily usage? No, no, no and no

[–] MasterNerd@lemm.ee 15 points 9 months ago

Maybe if you can use it with a locally running LLM server like ollama, but otherwise fuck no

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Here's my opinion. This terminal app is inefficient as fuck. I feel like it's too much bloat for what a terminal should be. She'll Completions have existed since forever, I don't get what's bringing new with that. And all these AI's that just resell chatgpt are getting expensive. "Please pay me 10$ a month to have OpenAI in your " . If I were to activate all the AI subscriptions in all the apps I use it would go over 100$. If I need ChatGPT I will just go on their website and get it from there. It's even cheaper that way, 20$ for unlimited use.

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And also sharing info with your team THROUGH THE TERMINAL? WHAT KINDA SHIT IS THAT. That should be documentation in THE REPOSITORY, IN THE PROJECT. You're just fragmenting information, and it's going to make it harder for you to keep it up to date and for people to find it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Kitty terminal with my zsh plugins are far better than asking me for an account on your terminal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 11 points 9 months ago
[–] gmhh@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

DO NOT WANT!

[–] Ozy@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

I don't like generative AI in my tools. The little prompt that explains a command and arguments that can be passed as you type is nice, I will give it that, but AI should not be any part of it. Fuck right off with it.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago

Local AI.

To complete complex commands.

Make ne feel like taking to a Star Trek ship computer.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 9 points 9 months ago

Well that's a new way to rm -rf /

No thx

[–] Saracha@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So I took some time to look around and as far as my perspective as a non dev regular user. While this does seem like a useful tool that could be useful for someone who interacts with the command line on a infrequent basis, the drawbacks on it seem pretty big.

  1. Everywhere on their website seems clear that they don't store your data, but I have trouble believing that? Why on earth they would need for you to create a account that you must log in to use the terminal if they don't have a need to monitor your data?
  2. While they claim that they are intending to monetize this by charging enterprise users and letting small teams use it for free, they limit free requests to 20 per dday which seems less than useless.
  3. Maybe this is just some confusion since I don't have any experience as an enterprise but it seems like it would be an unacceptable security risk having a program that it telling you that it sends telemetry back home that users are interacting with using sudo and elevated privileges. Especially when it is a closed box.

Ignoring all the reasons to be cautious and skeptical about AI in general I struggle to see the use case for this particular tool.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 7 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Shouldn't be too hard to make that run locally. Although I'm not sure what I'd use it for at the moment.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Although I’m not sure what I’d use it for at the moment.

How do I find all instances of "blarg" in the second column of this CSV file?

I could see it being useful - but I wouldn't want it integrated to my terminal. I'm fine with it being a separate thing I can use.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago

I think AI exposes how little trust people have in Capitalist organizations.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

There are lots of fish shell extensions, zsh stuff and loads of things that make suggestions, autocomplete, remember your shell history and remember frequently executed commands and visited directories. All of that works WAY better than the AI suff. (And sometimes also has nice pop-up menus.)

So compared to plain bash without autocomplete and Ctrl+R it may be useful. It is probably a step back for everyone else. Especially if they roughly know what they're doing.

But I didn't try this specific software. Maybe I would if it were free software and connected to a local LLM.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Presi300@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I'm not the biggest fan of the forced account thing, but I do like a lot of Warp's features. The command suggestions especially make dealing with tools that have like 1000 switches so much easier (like docker for example). Other than that... It's easy to customize, fast and looks good.

Tl;Dr: I like Warp, cry about it.

[–] ABeeinSpace@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Command suggestions can be provided by the shell too for what it’s worth. fish ships with autosuggestion and autocompletion. For zsh, you need a separate plugin (but it’s well worth it)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 9 months ago

Hell no! I absolutely do not want AI in anything if it's not running entirely locally.

load more comments
view more: next ›