this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
90 points (89.5% liked)

Linux

65813 readers
1024 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For those interested on the question of age verification and GNU/Linux: be aware that Systemd v261-rc1 was recently released. It now implements an optional birth date field in the JSON user database (see second item under "Other changes").

The implementation of this field was prompted by age-verification or -attestation laws.

(Age-verification status of Open Source Operating Systems.)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lambipapp@lemmy.world 88 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago
[–] M33@piefed.world 9 points 3 weeks ago
[–] excel@lemming.megumin.org 65 points 3 weeks ago (16 children)

Yes, right next to the fields for your full name and address, all of which are optional. It’s a total nothingburger.

[–] TheMadBeagle@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Did you ignore the comment in the github where it, and I quote "Stores the user's birth date for age verification, as required by recent laws in California (AB-1043), Colorado (SB26-051), Brazil (Lei 15.211/2025), etc.". Yes it is optional NOW, but this is in preparation of laws that make it legally Mandatory. Don't down play this.

[–] excel@lemming.megumin.org 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Miss me with this "slippery slope" BS.
Having a standardized place to store the DOB is a good thing and it should have been there even before these laws.
And if some users want to comply with those laws, then they should have a way to do it.
If anybody actually tries to make this a hard requirement (which isn't going to happen), then you can bitch about it at that time.

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

California's AB-1043 already passed, so we get to bitch about it now. Thanks for your support.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] xohshoo@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Just like the room number when using the adduser command

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] M33@piefed.world 32 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

It’s sad because at some point, when mainstream browsers will actually rely on systemd for that, website will block you.

Given enough time and ressources, that age control will hit hard like DRM.

[–] nocteb@feddit.org 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And then people will find another way to do what they want. Similar as they did with the internet as it started. It was not always a commercial cesspool, it started as a very nerdy space and replaced TV as a primary source of information. We can do it again. History does not show a pattern of people submitting, but a history of revolution.

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The masses submit; the vast majority submits. When they start to bind it at the hardware level - when eventually a government issued ID becomes required to literally enable hardware to work, then we are all screwed. You can always make your own software but not so much make your own CPU.

Then when they need to deal with the older tech aftermarket so they pass laws prohibiting older tech, it's all fucked.

[–] nocteb@feddit.org 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

Could someone explain to me why numerous Linux development groups are jumping on board with this bullshit? This is I think the third such post I've read that a distro or however you call it, is integrating the age check. Since when does the Linux community get on board with Big Brother????

[–] girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works 34 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

A surprising amount of people in the open source community lean alt-right including the lead dev of systemd, some of FUTO, and others like hyprland, etc. Others like the actual dev that committed the age field code to systemd state they are apolitical but in reality are actually enabling those that want to do harm.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago

There's a breed of incel who benefits from power tripping in community projects. Think reddit mods.

[–] northmaple1984@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This attack is no limited to "alt-right", it is across the political spectrum. Ex. there are plenty of lefty states implementing these laws.

Authoritarian is still authoritarianism whether it's from left or right.

(I'd also argue that software development is generally filled with leftists, I think the recent rise of prominent right-leaning developers is in reponse to many projects forgoing politically neutrality)

[–] girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

That's fair. Authoritarianism across the board is inherently anti-free and will give rise to enshittified or unsecure software given enough time. We're not only dealing with bigots that can't stand living on the same planet as others they don't understand, but also those that want strict authority and enforcement.

[–] helix@feddit.org 4 points 3 weeks ago

Well I mean if you add an age field now and pretend it works you might get in front of laws which would require a shittier version. Now they can say "we have age verification".

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I like my popcorn with sugar instead salt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

This is the end. Everyone switch to FreeBSD.

[–] racoon@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It is the year of FreeBSD on both the desktop and the server

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago

Been there. It sucked.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago

LMAO, good one!

[–] Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Is the default value set to "True"?

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago

Possibly 0 (zero) which would default to January 1, 1970.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

For... a date field?

Why would an optional field have a default value? Shouldn't it just be unset?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›