this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
122 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

85136 readers
4111 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Miller@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

Its the Microsoft approach to consent, yes or ask me again in three days.

[–] KingKong33@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago

Rapist mentality.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I've been to so many doctors that say if I don't opt in then they won't see me.

I've walked out a lot

[–] Bell@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Want to drown In a maze of dark patterns, privacy notices and terms & conditions? Just apply for an apartment.

[–] underThunder@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most likely a designer built these forms intentionally from requirements that tell him what elements need to be on each screen. It would be very simple to add an extra 'opt out' next to the opt in. The reasons the opt out option isn't there are numerous. Most are not intentionally deceptive but some are. I've found that a legal requirement for something to be in place is a strong incentive for business to make it happen.

[–] Monument@piefed.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I find your comment infuriating and I don’t exactly know why. It feels like you’ve tried to explain things for a less intelligent audience. If someone said that to me, I would struggle to fix my face.

You don’t have to use your first sentence to say that designers design designs, and you don’t have to spend two sentences (“The reasons […] but some are.”) to make a qualifier.

You could just say “Those fucks probably did it on purpose because there’s no law preventing them from it, and they will keep doing it, too”

Errybody knows companies are gonna roll you if they can get away with it.

[–] underThunder@thelemmy.club 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Maybe I should have dumbed it down a little more.

[–] Monument@piefed.world 1 points 4 days ago

Responding with an implied insult is transparent and seems small. It was already fairly dumbed down.

Your defensiveness is getting in the way of understanding my statement. The issue was a lack of faith in your audience.
This isn’t Reddit, and you don’t have to act like that here.